Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Thomas Prince

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Thomas Prince

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.6, Target = 96.5 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 95.6, Target = 96.575 or Higher All Students 94.0 96.0 95.6 -0.4 96.5 97.0 94269100Above Target
High needsCPI = 84.6, Target = 88.5 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 84.6, Target = 88.5 75 or Higher High needs 80.2 89.5 84.6 -4.9 88.5 90.1 84570Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 81.3, Target = 86.1 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 81.3, Target = 86.1 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 76.1 85.4 81.3 -4.1 86.1 88.1 934475On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.4, Target = 96.6 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 95.4, Target = 96.6 75 or Higher White 94.1 95.9 95.4 -0.5 96.6 97.1 85252100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.3, Target = 94.3 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 93.3, Target = 94.375 or Higher All Students 90.2 92.2 93.3 1.1 94.3 95.1 94269100Above Target
High needsCPI = 80.3, Target = 83.1 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 80.3, Target = 83.1 75 or Higher High needs 71.1 78.5 80.3 1.8 83.1 85.6 875750Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 78.4, Target = 80.1 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 78.4, Target = 80.1 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 65.9 75.0 78.4 3.4 80.1 83.0 964475On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.1, Target = 94.4 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 93.1, Target = 94.4 75 or Higher White 90.4 92.5 93.1 0.6 94.4 95.2 86252100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94, Target = 94.1 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 94, Target = 94.175 or Higher All Students 89.8 92.5 94.0 1.5 94.1 94.9 9891100Above Target
High needs  77.1---- 88.6-20--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------4--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.8, Target = 93.9 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 93.8, Target = 93.975 or Higher White 89.5 92.7 93.8 1.1 93.9 94.8 9588100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 32.1 25.32690 0.8 1.12690
High needs 7.8 3.5570 3.1 5.3570
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 2.4 2.3440 4.9 6.8440
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 29.5 24.62520 0.8 1.22520
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 41.8 45.42690 5.7 2.626925
High needs 15.6 15.8570 17.2 10.55725
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 12.2 11.4440 22.0 13.64425
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 39.3 44.825225 5.3 2.825225
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 24.1 36.39125 2.3 1.19125
High needs--20---20-
Econ. Disadvantaged--4---4-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.8 35.28825 1.3 1.18825
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 59, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 59.0 59.0 0.0 51.0No20975On Target
High needsSGP = 47, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 47, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 42.0 47.0 5.0 51.0No3150Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-11--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 59, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 5175 or Higher White 59.0 59.0 0.0 51.0No19675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 66, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 62.5 66.0 3.5 51.0No209100Above Target
High needsSGP = 61, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 54.0 61.0 7.0 51.0No31100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-11--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 63.5, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 63.5, Target = 51SGP = 63.5, Target = 5175 or Higher White 62.0 63.5 1.5 51.0No196100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students281280100Yes281280100Yes9696100Yes
High needs6161100Yes6161100Yes2222100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged18---18---4---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities4848100Yes4848100Yes19---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian6---6-------
Afr. Amer./Black1---1-------
Hispanic/Latino10---10---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White261260100Yes261260100Yes9292100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles