Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Pine Grove
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Pine Grove
Organization Information
District:Triton (07730000)School type:Elementary School
School:Pine Grove (07730025)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.8, Target = 95.5CPI = 91.8, Target = 95.5CPI = 91.8, Target = 95.5 92.2 91.3 91.8 0.5 95.5 96.1 7827350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 79.9, Target = 88.6CPI = 79.9, Target = 88.6CPI = 79.9, Target = 88.6 80.5 79.3 79.9 0.6 88.6 90.3 707250Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 88.2, Target = 91.3CPI = 88.2, Target = 91.3CPI = 88.2, Target = 91.3 90.5 90.5 88.2 -2.3 91.3 95.3 943675On Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 70.2, Target = 83.7CPI = 70.2, Target = 83.7CPI = 70.2, Target = 83.7 72.1 67.1 70.2 3.1 83.7 86.1 654250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.1, Target = 95.5CPI = 92.1, Target = 95.5CPI = 92.1, Target = 95.5 92.2 91.4 92.1 0.7 95.5 96.1 7326150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.8, Target = 92CPI = 82.8, Target = 92CPI = 82.8, Target = 92 86.3 84.0 82.8 -1.2 92.0 93.2 3727225No Change
High needsCPI = 61.1, Target = 84.8CPI = 61.1, Target = 84.8CPI = 61.1, Target = 84.8 73.9 67.8 61.1 -6.7 84.8 87.0 6720Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 67.4, Target = 78.4CPI = 67.4, Target = 78.4CPI = 67.4, Target = 78.4 76.4 76.4 67.4 -9.0 78.4 88.2 17360Declined
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 50, Target = 81.1CPI = 50, Target = 81.1CPI = 50, Target = 81.1 67.6 55.4 50.0 -5.4 81.1 83.8 14420Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.4, Target = 92.1CPI = 83.4, Target = 92.1CPI = 83.4, Target = 92.1 86.5 84.2 83.4 -0.8 92.1 93.3 2726025No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 76.1, Target = 94.3CPI = 76.1, Target = 94.3CPI = 76.1, Target = 94.3 90.3 88.1 76.1 -12.0 94.3 95.2 36910Declined
High needs -------28--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------16--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 76.7, Target = 94.6CPI = 76.7, Target = 94.6CPI = 76.7, Target = 94.6 90.8 87.9 76.7 -11.2 94.6 95.4 19870Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 21.3 26.027325 2.5 2.62730
High needs 10.0 11.17225 10.0 5.67225
Econ. Disadvantaged 16.2 19.43625 2.7 2.8360
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 2.6 2.4420 18.4 9.54225
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.5 25.726125 2.6 2.326125
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 26.8 33.527225 8.0 12.52720
High needs 14.5 15.3720 23.2 37.5720
Econ. Disadvantaged 24.3 22.2360 8.1 30.6360
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 2.7 7.14225 40.5 50.0420
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 26.0 33.526025 7.4 11.92600
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 25.4 13.2910 4.5 9.9910
High needs--28---28-
Econ. Disadvantaged--16---16-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 24.2 13.8870 4.5 9.2870
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 65.0 64.0 -1.0 51.0No199100Above Target
High needsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 58.0 52.0 -6.0 51.0No5475On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 60.0 55.0 -5.0 51.0No2875On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 62.0 49.0 -13.0 51.0No2950Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 66.0 64.0 -2.0 51.0No191100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 54.0 53.0 -1.0 51.0Yes19775On Target
High needsSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 41.5 41.0 -0.5 51.0No5350Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 44.0 39.0 -5.0 51.0No2825Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51 42.0 29.0 -13.0 51.0No280Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 54.0 53.0 -1.0 51.0Yes18975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students27727599Yes27727499Yes9191100Yes
High needs7373100Yes7373100Yes2828100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged3737100Yes3737100Yes16---
EL and Former EL2---2---2---
Students w/ disabilities4242100Yes4242100Yes14---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2---2-------
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---2---
Hispanic/Latino2---2---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White26526399Yes26526299Yes8787100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles