Massachusetts School and District Profiles

KIPP Academy Boston Charter School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - KIPP Academy Boston Charter School

Organization Information

District:

KIPP Academy Boston Charter School (District) (04630000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

KIPP Academy Boston Charter School (04630205)

Grades served:

K,01,05,06,07,08

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		75.7	75.6	85.9	10.3	81.8	87.9	31	281	100	Above Target
High needs		74.6	74.8	83.7	8.9	81.0	87.3	72	228	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		74.6	74.6	82.5	7.9	76.7	87.3	43	186	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		66.0	76.4	82.4	6.0	74.5	83.0	74	101	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		48.5	60.8	72.8	12.0	57.1	74.3	60	69	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		78.1	73.5	83.5	10.0	83.6	89.1	59	183	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		70.7	79.5	90.2	10.7	78.0	85.4	83	92	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		68.9	56.7	66.5	9.8	76.7	84.5	16	278	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		68.5	55.5	64.3	8.8	76.4	84.3	57	225	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		56.4	56.4	65.5	9.1	60.0	78.2	40	184	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		63.5	52.7	65.3	12.6	72.6	81.8	69	100	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		40.4	47.9	47.1	-0.8	50.3	70.2	41	69	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		72.9	56.8	64.3	7.5	79.7	86.5	58	182	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		60.9	55.0	70.6	15.6	70.7	80.5	67	90	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		85.4	74.6	58.9	-15.7	89.1	92.7	15	141	0	Declined
High needs		84.2	73.4	57.0	-16.4	88.2	92.1	31	114	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		71.5	71.5	56.1	-15.4	73.9	85.8	26	99	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		78.1	71.5	53.5	-18.0	83.6	89.1	83	50	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		63.8	-	-	-	-	81.9	-	27	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		88.8	72.8	59.9	-12.9	91.6	94.4	78	91	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		78.3	-	-	-	-	89.2	-	47	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	2.5	7.8	281	25	15.1	5.0	281	25
High needs	1.8	7.5	228	25	14.6	6.1	228	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.3	5.9	186	25	15.4	7.0	186	25
EL and Former EL	1.4	7.9	101	25	14.3	8.9	101	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	69	0	25.0	14.5	69	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	2.3	7.7	183	25	18.3	6.6	183	25
Hispanic/Latino	1.5	6.5	92	25	9.1	2.2	92	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	4.9	9.7	278	25	34.5	23.7	278	25
High needs	3.6	8.4	225	25	36.9	24.9	225	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.0	8.7	184	25	36.4	22.3	184	25
EL and Former EL	4.1	6.0	100	25	38.4	21.0	100	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	1.4	69	25	45.8	46.4	69	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	4.4	10.4	182	25	36.0	26.4	182	25
Hispanic/Latino	4.6	7.8	90	25	32.3	18.9	90	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	11.3	2.8	141	0	15.5	27.7	141	0
High needs	10.9	2.6	114	0	17.2	30.7	114	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	10.0	3.0	99	0	20.0	31.3	99	0
EL and Former EL	8.3	2.0	50	0	19.4	36.0	50	0
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	27	-	-	-	27	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	13.0	1.1	91	0	19.6	25.3	91	0
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	47	-	-	-	47	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		47.0	65.5	18.5	51.0	Yes	240	100	Above Target
High needs		47.0	65.0	18.0	51.0	Yes	196	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		47.0	63.5	16.5	51.0	Yes	160	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		47.0	72.0	25.0	51.0	Yes	89	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		51.5	56.5	5.0	51.0	Yes	52	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		46.0	64.0	18.0	51.0	Yes	152	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		47.5	68.5	21.0	51.0	Yes	82	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		47.0	66.5	19.5	51.0	Yes	244	100	Above Target
High needs		46.0	67.0	21.0	51.0	Yes	198	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		47.0	69.0	22.0	51.0	Yes	161	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		40.0	70.0	30.0	51.0	Yes	91	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		56.0	49.0	-7.0	51.0	No	55	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		52.5	64.0	11.5	51.0	Yes	159	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		37.0	75.0	38.0	51.0	Yes	79	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	45.0	60.0	66.00	0
High needs	45.0	60.0	66.00	0
EL and Former EL	45.0	60.0	66.00	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	284	283	100	Yes	284	280	99	Yes	144	143	99	Yes
High needs	231	230	100	Yes	231	227	98	Yes	117	116	99	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	186	186	100	Yes	186	184	99	Yes	99	99	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	103	103	100	Yes	103	102	99	Yes	52	52	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	70	69	99	Yes	70	69	99	Yes	28	27	96	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	184	183	99	Yes	184	182	99	Yes	92	91	99	Yes
Hispanic/Latino	94	94	100	Yes	94	92	98	Yes	49	49	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	1	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.