Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Northeast Elementary School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Northeast Elementary School

Organization Information

District:

Waltham (03080000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Northeast Elementary School (03080040)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		75.0	82.6	87.0	4.4	85.4	87.5	57	173	100	Above Target
High needs		61.3	72.1	75.7	3.6	77.4	80.7	49	68	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		81.7	81.7	80.1	-1.6	83.2	90.9	67	39	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		48.7	72.0	67.9	-4.1	70.1	74.4	40	28	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		76.0	64.1	68.0	3.9	86.0	88.0	60	32	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		50.0	85.0	78.1	-6.9	70.8	75.0	73	32	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		88.7	85.0	89.4	4.4	93.4	94.4	58	118	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		76.2	81.5	87.4	5.9	86.1	88.1	59	173	100	Above Target
High needs		65.2	70.0	77.9	7.9	79.7	82.6	58	68	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		77.4	77.4	82.1	4.7	79.3	88.7	75	39	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		55.4	71.0	77.7	6.7	74.0	77.7	62	28	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		75.0	66.4	70.3	3.9	85.4	87.5	66	32	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		54.2	82.0	80.5	-1.5	73.3	77.1	76	32	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		88.4	84.5	89.6	5.1	93.2	94.2	60	118	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		72.1	86.4	82.9	-3.5	83.7	86.1	57	54	75	On Target
High needs		54.0	-	-	-	-	77.0	-	20	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		84.5	87.8	82.4	-5.4	91.0	92.3	37	37	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	9.1	13.9	173	25	7.9	4.6	173	25
High needs	2.9	5.9	68	25	17.1	8.8	68	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	4.9	5.1	39	0	9.8	7.7	39	25
EL and Former EL	0.0	3.6	28	25	12.0	14.3	28	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	3.1	32	25	31.3	9.4	32	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Hispanic/Latino	4.0	3.1	32	0	4.0	6.3	32	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	11.6	17.8	118	25	7.1	5.1	118	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	21.8	27.2	173	25	10.3	5.8	173	25
High needs	10.0	16.2	68	25	20.0	13.2	68	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	9.8	20.5	39	25	12.2	12.8	39	0
EL and Former EL	8.0	14.3	28	25	24.0	14.3	28	25
Students w/ disabilities	3.1	12.5	32	25	25.0	21.9	32	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Hispanic/Latino	8.0	15.6	32	25	8.0	9.4	32	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	26.5	33.1	118	25	8.0	4.2	118	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	27.3	14.8	54	0	6.8	3.7	54	25
High needs	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	29.7	16.2	37	0	5.4	5.4	37	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		43.0	60.5	17.5	51.0	Yes	106	100	Above Target
High needs		41.0	58.5	17.5	51.0	No	36	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		42.0	76.0	34.0	51.0	Yes	73	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		46.0	58.0	12.0	51.0	Yes	107	75	On Target
High needs		47.5	62.0	14.5	51.0	Yes	36	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		45.0	56.0	11.0	51.0	Yes	74	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	72.0	60.0	31.00	25
High needs	72.0	60.0	31.00	25
EL and Former EL	72.0	60.0	31.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	180	180	100	Yes	180	180	100	Yes	55	55	100	Yes
High needs	72	72	100	Yes	72	72	100	Yes	20	20	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	41	41	100	Yes	41	41	100	Yes	11	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	32	32	100	Yes	32	32	100	Yes	5	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	32	32	100	Yes	32	32	100	Yes	11	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	14	-	-	-	14	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	36	36	100	Yes	36	36	100	Yes	8	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	119	119	100	Yes	119	119	100	Yes	37	37	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.