The School and District Profiles website will be unavailable from 3:00 PM (ET) on Monday, September 21 until 10:00 AM (ET) on Tuesday, September 22. Please visit the E2C Hub at https://educationtocareer.data.mass.gov/ for data during that time. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Dr. Kevin M. Hurley Middle School

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Dr. Kevin M. Hurley Middle School

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94, Target = 96.9 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 94, Target = 96.9 75 or Higher All Students 94.6 93.2 94.0 0.8 96.9 97.3 7151350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 83.1, Target = 91.4 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 83.1, Target = 91.4 75 or Higher High needs 85.3 81.3 83.1 1.8 91.4 92.7 6715850Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 87.2, Target = 89.4 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 87.2, Target = 89.4 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 88.4 88.4 87.2 -1.2 89.4 94.2 728025No Change
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 74.8, Target = 86.1 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 74.8, Target = 86.1 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 76.2 71.7 74.8 3.1 86.1 88.1 6710250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------13--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.2, Target = 96.9 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 94.2, Target = 96.9 75 or Higher White 94.6 93.2 94.2 1.0 96.9 97.3 6546150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.4, Target = 89.3 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 86.4, Target = 89.3 75 or Higher All Students 81.6 86.8 86.4 -0.4 89.3 90.8 7751025No Change
High needsCPI = 69.3, Target = 77 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 69.3, Target = 77 75 or Higher High needs 60.5 67.5 69.3 1.8 77.0 80.3 7715750Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.2, Target = 76.8 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 78.2, Target = 76.8CPI = 78.2, Target = 76.875 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 74.7 74.7 78.2 3.5 76.8 87.4 8879100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 57.4, Target = 68.9 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 57.4, Target = 68.9 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 46.7 57.2 57.4 0.2 68.9 73.4 7410250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------13--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.7, Target = 89.6 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 86.7, Target = 89.6 75 or Higher White 82.2 87.3 86.7 -0.6 89.6 91.1 7346025No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83, Target = 89.2 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 83, Target = 89.2 75 or Higher All Students 81.5 82.1 83.0 0.9 89.2 90.8 7817850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 65.9, Target = 76.2 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 65.9, Target = 76.2 75 or Higher High needs 59.2 64.8 65.9 1.1 76.2 79.6 755850Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 73.5, Target = 72 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 73.5, Target = 72CPI = 73.5, Target = 7275 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 69.4 69.4 73.5 4.1 72.0 84.7 8933100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 51.5, Target = 68.2 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 51.5, Target = 68.2 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 45.4 55.6 51.5 -4.1 68.2 72.7 49340Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.9, Target = 89.5 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 83.9, Target = 89.5 75 or Higher White 82.0 82.8 83.9 1.1 89.5 91.0 7716075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 17.5 23.051325 2.7 3.15130
High needs 4.6 6.315825 7.9 10.11580
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.5 10.08025 5.0 6.3800
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 1.1 2.010225 13.2 15.71020
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--13---13-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--24---24-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 17.6 23.246125 3.0 3.04610
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 25.2 24.15100 6.3 7.85100
High needs 10.0 7.01570 19.3 24.81570
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.3 6.3790 11.3 17.7790
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 6.7 6.91020 30.0 36.31020
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--13---13-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--23---23-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 25.9 24.34600 5.8 7.64600
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 4.5 8.417825 6.8 5.617825
High needs 5.6 1.7580 20.4 15.55825
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.2 3.0330 16.1 12.13325
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 6.5 0.0340 32.3 26.53425
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 4.4 8.116025 7.0 5.616025
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 45.0 55.0 10.0 51.0Yes48475On Target
High needsSGP = 46, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 46, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 39.0 46.0 7.0 51.0Yes14375On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 41, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 41, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 45.0 41.0 -4.0 51.0No7250Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 48, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities SGP = 48, Target = 51 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 33.0 48.0 15.0 51.0Yes91100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-11--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 56, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 5175 or Higher White 45.0 56.0 11.0 51.0Yes43875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 46.5, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 49.0 46.5 -2.5 51.0No48050Below Target
High needsSGP = 44, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 44, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 47.0 44.0 -3.0 51.0Yes14175On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 45, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 45, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 45.0 45.0 0.0 51.0Yes7175On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 37, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities SGP = 37, Target = 51 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 52.0 37.0 -15.0 51.0No9025Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-11--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 46, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 46, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 49.0 46.0 -3.0 51.0No43650Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02.00-
High needs- 60.02.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.02.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students52952499Yes52952198Yes182182100Yes
High needs16716398Yes16716297Yes6060100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged858296Yes858195Yes3434100Yes
EL and Former EL8---8---3---
Students w/ disabilities10910798Yes10910798Yes3636100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian14---14---4---
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---3---
Hispanic/Latino28---28---9---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.10---10---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White47146899Yes47146799Yes163163100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles