Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Leeds
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Leeds
Organization Information
District:Northampton (02100000)School type:Elementary School
School:Leeds (02100025)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Berkshires +Title I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85, Target = 92CPI = 85, Target = 92CPI = 85, Target = 92 86.3 88.2 85.0 -3.2 92.0 93.2 481730Declined
High needsCPI = 73.3, Target = 83.6CPI = 73.3, Target = 83.6CPI = 73.3, Target = 83.6 71.9 77.3 73.3 -4.0 83.6 86.0 38580Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75.6, Target = 77.6CPI = 75.6, Target = 77.6CPI = 75.6, Target = 77.6 75.6 75.6 75.6 0.0 77.6 87.8 444025No Change
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 60.8, Target = 80.4CPI = 60.8, Target = 80.4CPI = 60.8, Target = 80.4 66.4- 60.8 -2.1 80.4 83.2 403025No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino  71.4---- 85.7-31--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.6, Target = 93.5CPI = 88.6, Target = 93.5CPI = 88.6, Target = 93.5 88.9 90.9 88.6 -2.3 93.5 94.5 5211825No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.2, Target = 88CPI = 79.2, Target = 88CPI = 79.2, Target = 88 79.4 82.0 79.2 -2.8 88.0 89.7 251730Declined
High needsCPI = 59.9, Target = 78.4CPI = 59.9, Target = 78.4CPI = 59.9, Target = 78.4 62.9 69.3 59.9 -9.4 78.4 81.5 5580Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 61.9, Target = 72CPI = 61.9, Target = 72CPI = 61.9, Target = 72 69.4 69.4 61.9 -7.5 72.0 84.7 6400Declined
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 46.7, Target = 78.4CPI = 46.7, Target = 78.4CPI = 46.7, Target = 78.4 62.9- 46.7 -7.2 78.4 81.5 10300Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino  58.3---- 79.2-31--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.8, Target = 90.6CPI = 85.8, Target = 90.6CPI = 85.8, Target = 90.6 83.8 85.3 85.8 0.5 90.6 91.9 3811850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.8, Target = 90.5CPI = 84.8, Target = 90.5CPI = 84.8, Target = 90.5 83.7 89.9 84.8 -5.1 90.5 91.9 64660Declined
High needs  71.0---- 85.5-23--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------16--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.9, Target = 92.6CPI = 84.9, Target = 92.6CPI = 84.9, Target = 92.6 87.3 89.3 84.9 -4.4 92.6 93.7 50480Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 19.3 16.21730 4.5 6.91730
High needs 7.4 5.2580 11.1 17.2580
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.5 7.5400 15.0 15.0400
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0300 30.3 30.0300
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--31---31-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--17---17-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 24.2 19.51180 2.3 4.21180
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 26.9 27.21730 9.1 12.11730
High needs 11.3 10.3580 18.9 31.0580
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.0 12.54025 20.0 27.5400
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 3.33025 34.4 46.7300
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--31---31-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--17---17-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 29.0 28.81180 5.3 7.61180
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.8 13.6660 3.5 7.6660
High needs--23---23-
Econ. Disadvantaged--16---16-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 16.3 16.7480 4.1 8.3480
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 59.0 52.0 -7.0 51.0No11675On Target
High needsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 44.0 52.0 8.0 51.0No3775On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 51.5, Target = 51SGP = 51.5, Target = 51 51.0 51.5 0.5 51.0No2675On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 60.0 58.0 -2.0 51.0No8275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 55.0 50.0 -5.0 51.0No11750Below Target
High needsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 49.0 50.0 1.0 51.0No3750Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 53.0 51.0 -2.0 51.0No2675On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 56.0 52.0 -4.0 51.0No8375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students17917899Yes18017999Yes6868100Yes
High needs6060100Yes6060100Yes2525100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged4242100Yes4242100Yes18---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities3232100Yes3232100Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---4-------
Afr. Amer./Black3---3-------
Hispanic/Latino3434100Yes3535100Yes12---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.19---19---8---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White119119100Yes119119100Yes4848100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles