Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Rupert A Nock Middle

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Rupert A Nock Middle

Organization Information
District:Newburyport (02040000)School type:Middle School
School:Rupert A Nock Middle (02040305)Grades served:06,07,08
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.4, Target = 97.6CPI = 93.4, Target = 97.6CPI = 93.4, Target = 97.6 95.9 95.9 93.4 -2.5 97.6 98.0 6850125No Change
High needsCPI = 74.7, Target = 91.8CPI = 74.7, Target = 91.8CPI = 74.7, Target = 91.8 85.9 84.0 74.7 -9.3 91.8 93.0 24990Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.8, Target = 90.3CPI = 83.8, Target = 90.3CPI = 83.8, Target = 90.3 89.4 89.4 83.8 -5.6 90.3 94.7 51370Declined
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 64.6, Target = 89.9CPI = 64.6, Target = 89.9CPI = 64.6, Target = 89.9 82.6 75.4 64.6 -10.8 89.9 91.3 36670Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.8, Target = 97.7CPI = 93.8, Target = 97.7CPI = 93.8, Target = 97.7 96.1 96.3 93.8 -2.5 97.7 98.1 6147025No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.8, Target = 90.2CPI = 87.8, Target = 90.2CPI = 87.8, Target = 90.2 83.2 87.6 87.8 0.2 90.2 91.6 8150375On Target
High needsCPI = 60.6, Target = 75.3CPI = 60.6, Target = 75.3CPI = 60.6, Target = 75.3 57.7 65.1 60.6 -4.5 75.3 78.9 38990Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 67.6, Target = 75.3CPI = 67.6, Target = 75.3CPI = 67.6, Target = 75.3 73.1 73.1 67.6 -5.5 75.3 86.6 48370Declined
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 49.3, Target = 72.2CPI = 49.3, Target = 72.2CPI = 49.3, Target = 72.2 52.3 54.4 49.3 -5.1 72.2 76.2 48670Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.9, Target = 90.6CPI = 87.9, Target = 90.6CPI = 87.9, Target = 90.6 83.8 88.1 87.9 -0.2 90.6 91.9 7647375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.8, Target = 89.9CPI = 87.8, Target = 89.9CPI = 87.8, Target = 89.9 82.7 81.8 87.8 6.0 89.9 91.4 92162100Above Target
High needsCPI = 63.4, Target = 79.7CPI = 63.4, Target = 79.7CPI = 63.4, Target = 79.7 65.2 60.8 63.4 2.6 79.7 82.6 612850Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.6, Target = 90.6CPI = 88.6, Target = 90.6CPI = 88.6, Target = 90.6 83.8 82.6 88.6 6.0 90.6 91.9 92149100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 35.9 22.05010 2.2 3.85010
High needs 14.2 4.0990 10.4 19.2990
Econ. Disadvantaged 20.4 10.8370 5.6 13.5370
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities 7.0 0.0670 17.5 28.4670
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 36.3 22.14700 2.0 3.44700
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 41.5 32.45030 7.0 8.35030
High needs 11.3 8.1990 29.2 36.4990
Econ. Disadvantaged 18.9 10.8370 17.0 24.3370
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities 3.5 4.56725 43.9 49.3670
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 41.1 32.64730 6.5 8.04730
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 1.0 10.516225 8.2 4.316225
High needs 0.0 3.62825 27.0 25.0280
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--19---19-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 1.1 10.714925 7.7 4.014925
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 73.0 47.0 -26.0 51.0No48350Below Target
High needsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 73.0 47.0 -26.0 51.0No9150Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 72.5 46.5 -26.0 51.0No3450Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 73.0 45.0 -28.0 51.0No6150Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-8--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 72.0 47.0 -25.0 51.0No45550Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 66.5 60.0 -6.5 51.0No486100Above Target
High needsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 56.0 58.0 2.0 51.0No9175On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 63.5 59.0 -4.5 51.0No3375On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 48.0 46.0 -2.0 51.0No6150Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 66.0 60.0 -6.0 51.0No460100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.03-
High needs- 60.03-
EL and Former EL- 60.03-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students51751199Yes51751399Yes16916899Yes
High needs10610498Yes10610498Yes323197Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged4040100Yes4040100Yes10---
EL and Former EL10---10---5---
Students w/ disabilities727097Yes727097Yes20---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian10---10---4---
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---1---
Hispanic/Latino9---9---6---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.12---12---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White48347799Yes48348099Yes15415399Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles