Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Henry B. Burkland Elementary School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Henry B. Burkland Elementary School

Organization Information

District:

Middleborough (01820000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Henry B. Burkland Elementary School (01820008)

Grades served:

01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Southeast

Title I status:

Title I School (TA)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		80.4	80.8	84.4	3.6	88.6	90.2	44	359	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		69.3	69.1	75.8	6.7	82.1	84.7	50	163	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		73.1	73.1	79.4	6.3	75.3	86.6	62	131	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		55.9	48.1	58.1	10.0	74.3	78.0	31	65	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		81.0	81.4	85.2	3.8	88.9	90.5	33	310	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		78.3	81.4	83.1	1.7	87.3	89.2	39	350	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		66.9	70.6	72.8	2.2	80.7	83.5	36	158	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		74.4	74.4	76.6	2.2	76.5	87.2	50	128	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		55.3	50.7	52.0	1.3	73.9	77.7	17	62	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		79.6	82.2	84.1	1.9	88.1	89.8	29	301	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		81.1	83.4	76.9	-6.5	89.0	90.6	38	121	0	Declined
High needs		73.3	74.5	64.3	-10.2	84.4	86.7	39	49	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		79.1	79.1	67.9	-11.2	80.8	89.6	55	39	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		68.1	-	-	-	-	84.1	-	21	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		81.8	83.6	77.6	-6.0	89.4	90.9	22	104	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	6.5	9.5	359	25	9.6	5.8	359	25
High needs	2.4	4.9	163	25	20.7	12.3	163	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.3	5.3	131	25	15.9	9.2	131	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.5	1.5	65	0	41.8	29.2	65	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Asian	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	7.1	9.7	310	25	8.9	5.5	310	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	26.3	30.6	350	25	11.7	8.0	350	25
High needs	13.9	17.7	158	25	23.6	16.5	158	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	15.7	18.8	128	25	18.7	11.7	128	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.5	8.1	62	25	47.1	37.1	62	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Asian	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	26.4	32.6	301	25	11.0	7.3	301	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	14.1	9.9	121	0	4.7	10.7	121	0
High needs	8.3	4.1	49	0	12.5	24.5	49	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	10.8	5.1	39	0	8.1	20.5	39	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	15.9	9.6	104	0	4.4	10.6	104	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		42.0	47.0	5.0	51.0	Yes	234	75	On Target
High needs		41.0	46.0	5.0	51.0	Yes	100	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		42.0	47.0	5.0	51.0	Yes	80	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		40.0	45.0	5.0	51.0	Yes	41	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		42.0	46.0	4.0	51.0	Yes	203	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		49.0	40.0	-9.0	51.0	No	227	25	Below Target
High needs		43.0	38.0	-5.0	51.0	No	97	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		46.0	38.0	-8.0	51.0	No	79	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		36.0	32.5	-3.5	51.0	No	40	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		49.0	41.0	-8.0	51.0	No	195	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	8.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	8.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	8.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	375	371	99	Yes	378	365	97	Yes	126	124	98	Yes
High needs	173	171	99	Yes	174	167	96	Yes	50	50	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	141	139	99	Yes	141	136	96	Yes	40	40	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	69	67	97	Yes	70	65	95	Yes	21	21	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Asian	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	18	-	-	-	20	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	14	-	-	-	15	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	323	320	99	Yes	323	311	96	Yes	108	106	98	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.