Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Concord Middle

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Concord Middle

Organization Information

District:

Concord (00670000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Concord Middle (00670305)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		97.9	94.6	96.6	2.0	98.8	99.0	90	665	100	Above Target
High needs		92.1	83.1	86.2	3.1	95.4	96.1	82	150	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		91.0	91.0	85.5	-5.5	91.8	95.5	60	31	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		90.5	79.4	82.7	3.3	94.5	95.3	86	117	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		95.4	95.1	100.0	4.9	97.3	97.7	97	39	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		94.8	79.3	80.8	1.5	97.0	97.4	46	30	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		94.6	86.3	94.8	8.5	96.9	97.3	95	29	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		96.4	97.3	94.6	-2.7	97.3	98.2	70	28	0	Declined
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		98.4	95.8	97.4	1.6	99.1	99.2	93	538	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		91.2	90.7	93.5	2.8	94.9	95.6	97	664	100	Above Target
High needs		75.4	75.6	77.8	2.2	85.7	87.7	93	150	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		84.7	84.7	83.1	-1.6	86.0	92.4	95	31	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		72.9	70.0	73.5	3.5	84.2	86.5	96	117	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		94.1	97.3	98.7	1.4	96.6	97.1	92	39	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		69.8	67.2	64.2	-3.0	82.4	84.9	56	30	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		77.2	81.5	87.9	6.4	86.7	88.6	96	29	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		90.7	95.5	95.5	0.0	93.0	95.4	94	28	100	Above Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		92.7	91.7	95.0	3.3	95.7	96.4	98	537	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		88.0	92.9	84.9	-8.0	93.0	94.0	85	207	75	On Target
High needs		71.9	78.1	64.7	-13.4	83.6	86.0	71	56	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		69.1	74.4	61.4	-13.0	82.0	84.6	82	46	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		88.6	95.3	85.8	-9.5	93.4	94.3	84	169	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	31.5	42.0	665	25	2.5	1.7	665	25
High needs	7.2	13.3	150	25	9.0	7.3	150	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	25.0	22.6	31	0	5.6	9.7	31	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Students w/ disabilities	2.3	7.7	117	25	10.8	9.4	117	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	41.3	61.5	39	25	4.3	0.0	39	25
Afr. Amer./Black	13.8	13.3	30	0	17.2	10.0	30	25
Hispanic/Latino	29.0	31.0	29	0	9.7	3.4	29	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	35.7	46.4	28	25	0.0	7.1	28	0
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	31.5	42.6	538	25	1.3	0.9	538	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	46.9	56.8	664	25	4.9	4.2	664	25
High needs	18.0	22.7	150	25	16.2	16.7	150	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	30.6	22.6	31	0	8.3	12.9	31	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Students w/ disabilities	10.7	15.4	117	25	20.6	20.5	117	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	70.2	87.2	39	25	2.1	0.0	39	25
Afr. Amer./Black	10.3	6.7	30	0	24.1	33.3	30	0
Hispanic/Latino	32.3	41.4	29	25	12.9	10.3	29	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	46.4	60.7	28	25	3.6	3.6	28	0
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	47.7	58.1	537	25	3.7	2.6	537	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	15.7	22.2	207	25	1.7	8.7	207	0
High needs	3.6	3.6	56	0	7.1	26.8	56	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Students w/ disabilities	2.3	2.2	46	0	9.1	30.4	46	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	17.2	21.9	169	25	1.1	7.7	169	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		45.0	54.0	9.0	51.0	Yes	641	75	On Target
High needs		30.0	52.0	22.0	51.0	Yes	145	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		41.5	34.0	-7.5	51.0	No	29	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		28.0	45.0	17.0	51.0	Yes	113	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		50.0	54.0	4.0	51.0	Yes	38	75	On Target
Afr. Amer./Black		27.0	47.5	20.5	51.0	No	30	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		26.5	59.0	32.5	51.0	Yes	25	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		49.0	48.0	-1.0	51.0	No	25	50	Below Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		47.0	54.0	7.0	51.0	Yes	522	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		43.0	57.0	14.0	51.0	Yes	634	75	On Target
High needs		41.5	52.0	10.5	51.0	Yes	137	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		44.5	31.0	-13.5	51.0	No	27	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		38.5	52.0	13.5	51.0	Yes	105	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		63.0	61.0	-2.0	51.0	Yes	39	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	27	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		40.5	37.0	-3.5	51.0	Yes	25	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	25	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		43.0	58.0	15.0	51.0	Yes	517	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	7.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	7.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	7.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	682	674	99	Yes	682	673	99	Yes	210	210	100	Yes
High needs	158	156	99	Yes	158	156	99	Yes	58	58	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	34	34	100	Yes	34	34	100	Yes	9	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	22	-	-	-	22	-	-	-	8	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	121	119	98	Yes	121	119	98	Yes	46	46	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	40	40	100	Yes	40	40	100	Yes	14	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	30	30	100	Yes	30	30	100	Yes	7	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	31	30	97	Yes	31	30	97	Yes	10	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	29	29	100	Yes	29	29	100	Yes	8	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	551	544	99	Yes	551	543	99	Yes	171	171	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.