Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Boylston Elementary

View selected organization
print page

This organization is currently closed.


2016 Accountability Data - Boylston Elementary

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.1, Target = 94.8 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 92.1, Target = 94.8 75 or Higher All Students 91.1 90.2 92.1 1.9 94.8 95.6 7916550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 76.9, Target = 85 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 76.9, Target = 85 75 or Higher High needs 74.3 78.5 76.9 -1.6 85.0 87.2 553925No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 64, Target = 85.4 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 64, Target = 85.4 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 75.0 72.0 64.0 -8.0 85.4 87.5 48250Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.8, Target = 95 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 93.8, Target = 95 75 or Higher White 91.4 91.6 93.8 2.2 95.0 95.7 8414875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.5, Target = 93.6 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 90.5, Target = 93.6 75 or Higher All Students 89.0 85.7 90.5 4.8 93.6 94.5 7316550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 76.9, Target = 82.2 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 76.9, Target = 82.2 75 or Higher High needs 69.4 74.4 76.9 2.5 82.2 84.7 553950Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 65, Target = 80.6 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 65, Target = 80.6 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 66.7 70.0 65.0 -5.0 80.6 83.4 52250Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.9, Target = 93.4 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 91.9, Target = 93.4 75 or Higher White 88.6 86.3 91.9 5.6 93.4 94.3 7414850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.4, Target = 93 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 88.4, Target = 93 75 or Higher All Students 88.0 81.4 88.4 7.0 93.0 94.0 775850Improved Below Target
High needs -------16--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------5--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.8, Target = 92.4 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 89.8, Target = 92.4 75 or Higher White 86.9 81.1 89.8 8.7 92.4 93.5 755475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 13.9 13.91650 3.6 1.816525
High needs 4.7 2.6390 14.0 7.73925
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 8.0 4.0250 20.0 12.02525
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 13.9 14.21480 2.6 0.714825
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 26.2 40.616525 6.1 3.616525
High needs 11.6 20.53925 14.0 12.8390
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 12.0 8.0250 16.0 20.0250
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 25.3 40.514825 5.3 2.714825
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 11.9 20.75825 3.4 6.9580
High needs--16---16-
Econ. Disadvantaged--5---5-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 9.4 22.25425 3.8 5.6540
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 45, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 45, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 52.0 45.0 -7.0 51.0Yes10875On Target
High needsSGP = 32, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 32, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 44.5 32.0 -12.5 51.0No2725Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-11--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 45, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 45, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 52.0 45.0 -7.0 51.0Yes9975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 45.5, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 39.0 45.5 6.5 51.0Yes10875On Target
High needsSGP = 45, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 45, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 40.5 45.0 4.5 51.0Yes2775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-11--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 45, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 45, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 39.0 45.0 6.0 51.0Yes9975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.05.00-
High needs- 60.05.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.05.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students165165100Yes165165100Yes5858100Yes
High needs3939100Yes3939100Yes16---
Econ. Disadvantaged17---17---5---
EL and Former EL3---3---1---
Students w/ disabilities2525100Yes2525100Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian7---7---2---
Afr. Amer./Black5---5---1---
Hispanic/Latino3---3---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White148148100Yes148148100Yes5454100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles