Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Kenny Elementary School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Thomas J Kenny

Organization Information

District:

Boston (00350000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Thomas J Kenny (00350328)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		57.9	64.4	62.3	-2.1	75.4	79.0	3	122	25	No Change
High needs		57.5	62.3	61.0	-1.3	75.2	78.8	6	109	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		60.1	60.1	61.8	1.7	63.4	80.1	6	91	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		58.7	64.1	59.1	-5.0	75.9	79.4	14	58	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		31.6	41.4	28.7	-12.7	54.4	65.8	1	27	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		53.8	61.6	58.0	-3.6	73.1	76.9	5	72	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		55.0	63.0	56.3	-6.7	73.8	77.5	4	28	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		61.1	63.8	75.0	11.2	77.3	80.6	15	121	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		61.0	61.1	75.0	13.9	77.3	80.5	46	108	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		60.6	60.6	75.6	15.0	63.9	80.3	45	90	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		61.1	64.1	74.1	10.0	77.3	80.6	50	58	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		32.4	36.3	43.3	7.0	54.9	66.2	7	26	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		56.9	60.9	68.8	7.9	74.9	78.5	37	72	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		53.8	56.5	74.1	17.6	73.1	76.9	50	28	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		31.3	42.6	40.4	-2.2	59.9	65.7	1	34	25	No Change
High needs		29.3	42.4	38.3	-4.1	58.8	64.7	1	30	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
EL and Former EL		28.0	-	-	-	-	64.0	-	20	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		26.8	-	-	-	-	63.4	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	4.9	3.3	122	0	24.4	26.2	122	0
High needs	4.6	3.7	109	0	25.9	27.5	109	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.7	4.4	91	0	28.7	26.4	91	0
EL and Former EL	3.1	1.7	58	0	23.4	25.9	58	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	27	0	46.9	70.4	27	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Asian	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Afr. Amer./Black	4.2	4.2	72	0	28.2	29.2	72	0
Hispanic/Latino	3.7	0.0	28	0	25.9	32.1	28	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	13.2	16.5	121	25	27.3	15.7	121	25
High needs	10.4	15.7	108	25	30.2	15.7	108	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	11.8	15.6	90	25	30.6	14.4	90	25
EL and Former EL	10.9	13.8	58	25	28.1	15.5	58	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	26	0	67.7	53.8	26	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Afr. Amer./Black	10.1	11.1	72	0	30.4	19.4	72	25
Hispanic/Latino	11.1	10.7	28	0	37.0	17.9	28	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.0	0.0	34	0	50.0	55.9	34	0
High needs	0.0	0.0	30	0	51.5	60.0	30	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		62.5	35.0	-27.5	51.0	No	77	25	Below Target
High needs		65.5	35.0	-30.5	51.0	No	67	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		64.0	35.0	-29.0	51.0	No	54	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		72.0	35.0	-37.0	51.0	No	35	25	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		67.0	44.0	-23.0	51.0	No	43	50	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		77.0	80.5	3.5	51.0	Yes	76	100	Above Target
High needs		77.0	81.5	4.5	51.0	Yes	66	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		77.0	81.0	4.0	51.0	Yes	53	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		80.5	85.0	4.5	51.0	Yes	35	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		78.5	81.0	2.5	51.0	Yes	43	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	56.0	60.0	104.00	0
High needs	56.0	60.0	104.00	0
EL and Former EL	56.0	60.0	104.00	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	141	141	100	Yes	140	140	100	Yes	41	41	100	Yes
High needs	128	128	100	Yes	127	127	100	Yes	37	37	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	108	108	100	Yes	107	107	100	Yes	29	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	67	67	100	Yes	67	67	100	Yes	24	24	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	32	32	100	Yes	31	31	100	Yes	9	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	2	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	16	-	-	-	16	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	80	80	100	Yes	80	80	100	Yes	22	22	100	Yes
Hispanic/Latino	36	36	100	Yes	36	36	100	Yes	11	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.