Massachusetts School and District Profiles

A. Irvin Studley Elementary School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - A. Irvin Studley Elementary School

Organization Information

District:

Attleboro (00160000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

A. Irvin Studley Elementary School (00160001)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04

Region:

Southeast

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		80.2	76.8	80.8	4.0	88.5	90.1	29	195	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		70.3	63.4	70.0	6.6	82.7	85.2	24	100	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		68.5	68.5	72.1	3.6	71.1	84.3	28	68	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		67.9	59.3	64.6	5.3	81.3	84.0	30	41	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		56.4	44.4	51.5	7.1	74.6	78.2	16	33	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		72.1	65.2	70.3	5.1	83.7	86.1	40	53	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		84.7	83.9	85.6	1.7	91.1	92.4	36	125	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		85.0	87.7	88.6	0.9	91.3	92.5	64	195	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		76.4	77.8	82.5	4.7	86.2	88.2	78	100	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		79.8	79.8	82.4	2.6	81.5	89.9	75	68	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		71.4	78.6	84.8	6.2	83.3	85.7	79	41	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		71.8	60.5	66.7	6.2	83.6	85.9	56	33	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		74.4	83.8	85.8	2.0	85.1	87.2	88	53	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		89.9	90.9	89.2	-1.7	94.1	95.0	57	125	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	2.4	9.2	195	25	9.5	10.3	195	0
High needs	1.1	4.0	100	25	17.0	18.0	100	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.6	4.4	68	25	12.9	14.7	68	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	2.4	41	25	14.3	22.0	41	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	3.0	33	25	45.2	42.4	33	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	3.8	53	25	11.8	18.9	53	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	2.9	12.0	125	25	4.8	6.4	125	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	27.2	34.4	195	25	5.9	6.2	195	0
High needs	14.8	19.0	100	25	11.4	11.0	100	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	19.4	19.1	68	0	11.3	11.8	68	0
EL and Former EL	5.7	12.2	41	25	11.4	9.8	41	25
Students w/ disabilities	3.2	18.2	33	25	22.6	27.3	33	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	11.8	18.9	53	25	7.8	5.7	53	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	35.6	41.6	125	25	2.9	6.4	125	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		37.0	49.5	12.5	51.0	Yes	98	75	On Target
High needs		31.5	49.0	17.5	51.0	Yes	49	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		32.5	50.0	17.5	51.0	Yes	35	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	29	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		37.0	51.5	14.5	51.0	Yes	56	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		39.5	49.0	9.5	51.0	Yes	98	75	On Target
High needs		26.5	46.0	19.5	51.0	Yes	49	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		25.5	43.0	17.5	51.0	Yes	35	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	29	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		48.0	48.0	0.0	51.0	No	56	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	62.0	60.0	70.00	25
High needs	62.0	60.0	70.00	25
EL and Former EL	62.0	60.0	70.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	197	197	100	Yes	197	197	100	Yes	-	-	-	-
High needs	101	101	100	Yes	101	101	100	Yes	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	68	68	100	Yes	68	68	100	Yes	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	42	42	100	Yes	42	42	100	Yes	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	33	33	100	Yes	33	33	100	Yes	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	54	54	100	Yes	54	54	100	Yes	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	126	126	100	Yes	126	126	100	Yes	-	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.