MCAS Annual Comparisons
| GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS |
|---|
| ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | | ADVANCED | 11 | 14 | 28 | 26 | | PROFICIENT | 75 | 74 | 66 | 68 | | NEEDS IMPROVEMENT | 13 | 12 | 6 | 6 | | FAILING | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | |
|
| GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS |
|---|
| ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | | ADVANCED | 26 | 36 | 55 | 46 | | PROFICIENT | 51 | 49 | 32 | 41 | | NEEDS IMPROVEMENT | 21 | 15 | 11 | 10 | | FAILING | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | | |
|
| GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG |
|---|
| ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | | ADVANCED | 16 | 15 | 22 | 15 | | PROFICIENT | 58 | 54 | 57 | 65 | | NEEDS IMPROVEMENT | 25 | 27 | 19 | 16 | | FAILING | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | | |
|
1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
