• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 30 35 49 40 PROFICIENT 55 59 45 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 12 5 5 7 FAILING 3 2 2 1

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 44 41 55 59 PROFICIENT 31 46 24 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 8 14 12 FAILING 4 5 6 2

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 21 20 25 PROFICIENT 53 56 54 57 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 18 23 15 FAILING 5 4 3 3

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 29 23 12 PROFICIENT 64 59 62 72 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 12 8 9 13 WARNING 3 4 6 4

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 23 14 6 PROFICIENT 30 35 37 29 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 32 34 42 WARNING 19 11 15 22

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 5 4 0 PROFICIENT 47 49 36 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 38 38 48 45 WARNING 8 8 12 8

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 16 11 6 PROFICIENT 58 69 62 59 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 13 23 30 WARNING 4 3 4 5

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 28 26 14 8 PROFICIENT 35 39 34 26 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 25 39 40 WARNING 10 10 13 26

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 19 11 12 PROFICIENT 59 58 61 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 20 21 26 WARNING 4 4 7 7

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 30 30 12 15 PROFICIENT 40 39 43 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 22 35 22 WARNING 8 8 11 21

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 15 15 11 PROFICIENT 58 45 51 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 33 24 32 WARNING 4 7 10 9

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 20 12 20 PROFICIENT 46 30 40 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 39 37 36 WARNING 10 12 11 10

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 20 10 11 PROFICIENT 49 39 41 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 35 44 43 WARNING 2 6 5 6

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 8 6 13 PROFICIENT 40 54 45 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 43 31 38 43 WARNING 6 7 11 7

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 19 15 16 PROFICIENT 35 40 41 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 40 34 44 43 WARNING 5 7 1 6

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 11 10 10 PROFICIENT 47 54 51 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 28 31 29 WARNING 6 7 8 10

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 23 31 26 PROFICIENT 57 40 37 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 31 23 14 WARNING 4 6 9 10

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.