• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 48 56 56 61 PROFICIENT 50 40 44 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 2 2 0 0 FAILING 0 2 0 0

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 51 49 57 66 PROFICIENT 44 38 30 25 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 4 11 13 10 FAILING 0 2 0 0

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 26 30 28 33 PROFICIENT 52 50 47 53 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 19 22 13 FAILING 0 2 3 0

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 13 11 19 PROFICIENT 67 75 66 74 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 9 21 7 WARNING 0 3 2 0

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 20 17 17 PROFICIENT 29 38 34 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 32 38 26 WARNING 17 10 11 17

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 1 0 0 PROFICIENT 36 46 32 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 53 39 58 48 WARNING 3 13 9 4

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 14 10 8 PROFICIENT 84 51 71 64 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 9 31 17 23 WARNING 0 4 2 6

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 24 22 15 PROFICIENT 32 29 37 26 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 46 37 29 26 WARNING 9 10 12 32

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 20 14 11 PROFICIENT 63 53 49 66 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 24 27 20 WARNING 4 3 10 4

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 22 22 21 PROFICIENT 29 31 33 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 29 27 29 WARNING 18 19 18 16

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 32 16 15 17 PROFICIENT 48 45 56 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 29 28 23 WARNING 3 10 2 13

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 20 22 13 PROFICIENT 33 33 23 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 31 43 36 WARNING 28 16 12 19

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 27 17 32 PROFICIENT 47 45 48 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 25 33 26 WARNING 10 2 2 4

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 11 13 17 PROFICIENT 38 51 42 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 32 46 26 WARNING 17 6 0 11

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 17 6 26 PROFICIENT 33 37 29 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 52 37 57 35 WARNING 7 10 8 7

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 10 5 13 PROFICIENT 54 51 50 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 37 41 40 WARNING 2 2 4 5

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 14 14 12 PROFICIENT 46 31 43 22 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 33 29 46 WARNING 5 22 14 20

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.