• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation
• PARCC Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 2015 2016 ADVANCED 49 46 53 55 PROFICIENT 44 47 46 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 6 3 1 1 FAILING 0 3 1 0

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 2015 2016 ADVANCED 62 55 63 64 PROFICIENT 28 32 26 25 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 8 8 9 FAILING 0 5 3 2

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 2015 2016 ADVANCED 27 36 34 23 PROFICIENT 62 42 47 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 19 19 22 FAILING 1 3 1 1

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 15 PROFICIENT 76 76 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 7 7 WARNING 1 2

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 22 PROFICIENT 39 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 30 WARNING 8 8

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 2015 2016 ADVANCED 4 3 1 3 PROFICIENT 43 45 51 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 47 41 41 42 WARNING 6 10 6 8

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 14 PROFICIENT 69 74 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 10 WARNING 2 2

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 18 PROFICIENT 44 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 32 WARNING 10 10

NOTE: Spring 2016 results in grades 3-8 ELA and Mathematics are not reported because all students in this organization participated in the PARCC test.