• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 56 47 43 PROFICIENT 61 39 49 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 11 3 3 4 FAILING 2 2 2 3

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 37 53 47 44 PROFICIENT 40 31 31 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 14 17 20 FAILING 2 2 5 9

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 40 17 25 PROFICIENT 55 45 64 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 12 18 17 FAILING 1 3 2 3

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 8 12 11 PROFICIENT 63 69 62 69 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 19 18 13 WARNING 3 5 8 7

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 14 6 23 PROFICIENT 34 31 33 30 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 31 32 31 WARNING 24 24 30 17

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 4 2 6 PROFICIENT 34 39 37 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 51 39 45 40 WARNING 12 19 17 6

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 4 2 4 PROFICIENT 61 54 59 61 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 34 31 31 WARNING 9 7 7 4

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 16 18 9 PROFICIENT 36 36 32 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 33 31 32 WARNING 18 15 20 21

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 8 7 9 PROFICIENT 44 43 56 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 37 26 28 WARNING 11 13 11 9

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 19 13 34 PROFICIENT 33 34 47 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 33 27 18 WARNING 24 15 13 7

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 7 7 7 PROFICIENT 40 48 56 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 45 31 30 44 WARNING 9 14 8 15

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 5 15 22 PROFICIENT 43 31 50 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 38 26 26 WARNING 15 26 8 16

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 8 16 11 PROFICIENT 41 47 41 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 39 41 38 WARNING 6 5 2 8

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 8 3 7 PROFICIENT 38 48 38 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 48 35 50 43 WARNING 11 9 9 10

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 3 8 8 PROFICIENT 30 21 17 29 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 50 58 64 51 WARNING 16 18 11 12

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 8 12 8 PROFICIENT 58 50 40 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 36 44 35 WARNING 4 7 4 18

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 16 18 12 PROFICIENT 55 33 39 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 39 27 29 WARNING 3 12 16 10

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.