• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 55 70 78 80 PROFICIENT 34 27 19 18 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 2 2 2 FAILING 4 1 1 0

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 63 81 74 85 PROFICIENT 23 15 20 11 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 4 2 3 FAILING 6 1 3 0

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 41 56 52 56 PROFICIENT 44 37 42 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 11 7 5 9 FAILING 4 1 1 1

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 40 37 36 19 PROFICIENT 53 59 58 77 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 5 4 2 4 WARNING 2 0 4 0

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 37 47 29 31 PROFICIENT 42 37 44 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 14 13 20 19 WARNING 8 3 7 3

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 14 9 8 PROFICIENT 68 64 54 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 17 32 40 WARNING 3 4 4 0

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 34 24 18 32 PROFICIENT 61 64 75 63 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 5 11 7 5 WARNING 0 1 0 0

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 42 37 32 25 PROFICIENT 41 35 43 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 14 22 22 16 WARNING 2 6 3 4

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 39 44 40 35 PROFICIENT 49 48 53 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 7 7 10 WARNING 3 0 0 3

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 36 36 37 42 PROFICIENT 38 42 44 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 19 15 20 WARNING 6 4 4 6

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 28 36 33 PROFICIENT 62 57 51 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 15 11 10 WARNING 0 0 2 2

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 35 40 43 44 PROFICIENT 43 46 39 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 13 15 16 WARNING 3 2 3 5

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 35 30 26 PROFICIENT 55 40 42 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 23 25 21 WARNING 3 2 3 4

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 33 14 23 PROFICIENT 57 48 66 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 15 18 29 WARNING 1 3 2 2

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 30 30 31 32 PROFICIENT 46 50 48 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 15 20 31 WARNING 2 5 2 2

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 31 22 22 PROFICIENT 58 56 55 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 12 20 21 WARNING 3 2 3 3

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 26 34 45 41 PROFICIENT 62 45 42 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 11 18 13 18 WARNING 2 3 1 3

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.