• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 34 46 51 52 PROFICIENT 57 48 43 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 4 5 7 FAILING 1 2 1 1

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 46 57 63 52 PROFICIENT 35 29 26 28 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 9 8 16 FAILING 3 4 3 5

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 18 19 23 PROFICIENT 56 58 68 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 23 12 27 FAILING 1 1 1 1

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 27 16 23 17 PROFICIENT 64 67 62 75 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 17 12 8 WARNING 1 0 4 0

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 15 13 10 PROFICIENT 40 28 36 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 38 33 35 WARNING 10 19 18 7

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 4 1 3 PROFICIENT 44 32 29 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 49 43 52 52 WARNING 6 21 18 6

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 12 8 4 PROFICIENT 57 60 74 80 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 24 17 13 WARNING 0 4 1 3

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 11 6 10 PROFICIENT 29 26 43 24 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 39 42 33 WARNING 28 25 10 33

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 19 24 18 PROFICIENT 53 58 52 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 23 18 27 WARNING 4 0 5 6

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 23 23 24 PROFICIENT 45 39 30 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 35 27 29 WARNING 13 2 20 15

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 22 13 8 PROFICIENT 47 42 49 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 29 33 25 WARNING 5 6 5 16

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 18 22 24 PROFICIENT 41 24 43 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 38 36 24 28 WARNING 8 22 11 16

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 32 20 17 PROFICIENT 44 31 37 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 28 34 36 WARNING 5 9 9 13

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 11 17 24 PROFICIENT 42 43 46 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 37 24 24 WARNING 7 9 13 7

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 10 17 17 PROFICIENT 30 34 46 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 51 45 27 40 WARNING 11 11 10 5

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 9 11 9 PROFICIENT 56 28 39 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 49 42 48 WARNING 5 14 9 7

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 13 10 12 PROFICIENT 55 26 37 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 34 32 34 WARNING 6 28 22 17

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.