• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 35 42 40 PROFICIENT 71 60 57 58 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 5 1 2 FAILING 0 0 0 0

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 46 53 67 48 PROFICIENT 44 32 27 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 15 5 8 FAILING 0 0 1 0

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 18 22 17 PROFICIENT 53 47 55 57 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 35 24 23 FAILING 0 0 0 3

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 6 13 4 PROFICIENT 75 81 66 70 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 11 13 17 22 WARNING 0 0 3 5

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 12 19 6 PROFICIENT 42 34 38 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 46 34 43 WARNING 5 9 9 19

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 0 1 0 0 PROFICIENT 17 20 20 16 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 70 52 54 55 WARNING 13 27 26 29

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 3 0 5 PROFICIENT 72 65 59 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 30 35 34 WARNING 0 2 6 5

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 23 2 6 PROFICIENT 42 31 25 25 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 34 42 49 WARNING 10 12 31 20

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 5 4 4 PROFICIENT 60 48 53 53 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 33 32 36 WARNING 3 14 10 7

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 12 9 11 PROFICIENT 33 30 37 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 42 42 42 WARNING 11 15 11 11

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 8 11 7 PROFICIENT 48 47 56 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 44 38 31 32 WARNING 6 8 2 9

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 6 14 12 PROFICIENT 38 32 40 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 41 42 40 36 WARNING 16 19 6 15

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 4 7 11 PROFICIENT 14 25 34 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 56 51 50 43 WARNING 26 20 9 12

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 8 2 4 PROFICIENT 45 46 44 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 41 39 43 53 WARNING 8 7 12 16

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 5 8 10 PROFICIENT 30 37 42 23 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 55 50 46 57 WARNING 10 8 5 10

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 13 7 3 PROFICIENT 60 44 41 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 39 47 48 WARNING 2 5 4 7

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 24 18 17 PROFICIENT 66 42 44 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 24 30 31 WARNING 3 9 9 5

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.