• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 25 20 13 PROFICIENT 53 60 58 73 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 9 16 14 FAILING 6 6 7 0

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 26 32 30 23 PROFICIENT 35 38 30 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 19 21 22 FAILING 8 12 19 17

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 6 17 6 PROFICIENT 53 45 33 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 38 41 42 49 FAILING 5 8 7 1

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 8 3 2 PROFICIENT 53 68 57 61 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 15 30 24 WARNING 17 8 10 13

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 12 9 5 PROFICIENT 24 23 26 26 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 41 35 36 WARNING 37 25 30 33

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 3 0 1 PROFICIENT 25 30 34 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 47 50 41 45 WARNING 27 18 25 20

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 0 1 4 PROFICIENT 56 51 47 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 39 41 32 WARNING 10 10 11 15

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 0 3 3 PROFICIENT 13 26 22 19 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 37 34 38 WARNING 50 36 40 39

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 6 6 5 PROFICIENT 49 44 43 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 37 36 40 WARNING 10 13 15 14

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 7 5 9 PROFICIENT 38 26 31 17 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 36 38 41 WARNING 24 32 26 33

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 3 7 6 PROFICIENT 37 41 44 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 45 37 33 30 WARNING 13 19 16 10

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 10 11 16 PROFICIENT 31 33 29 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 28 37 29 WARNING 28 29 23 24

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 12 13 17 PROFICIENT 45 30 39 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 38 37 34 WARNING 17 20 11 16

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 2 0 7 PROFICIENT 31 37 37 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 38 42 46 48 WARNING 29 20 17 14

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 5 9 15 PROFICIENT 31 24 29 26 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 45 51 46 48 WARNING 20 20 16 11

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 8 2 15 PROFICIENT 37 49 41 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 35 49 38 WARNING 14 8 8 10

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 27 20 27 PROFICIENT 40 33 32 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 24 34 20 WARNING 17 17 15 7

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.