• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 35 33 38 35 PROFICIENT 49 49 49 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 14 16 11 18 WARNING 2 1 2 1

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 44 43 57 53 PROFICIENT 31 36 26 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 14 14 9 WARNING 6 7 4 4

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 40 33 32 PROFICIENT 50 36 47 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 22 18 23 WARNING 2 1 2 3

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 33 25 41 PROFICIENT 53 47 57 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 15 17 8 WARNING 4 5 1 3

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 38 40 47 53 PROFICIENT 36 42 37 30 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 15 16 15 WARNING 2 3 0 2

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.