• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 62 67 78 64 PROFICIENT 34 32 22 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 2 1 1 1 FAILING 2 0 0 3

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 69 73 76 74 PROFICIENT 25 22 21 21 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 2 6 3 2 FAILING 3 0 0 3

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 29 40 28 35 PROFICIENT 55 46 55 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 14 17 16 FAILING 3 0 0 3

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 38 31 48 32 PROFICIENT 57 63 50 64 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 5 2 2 3 WARNING 0 3 1 1

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 49 43 40 40 PROFICIENT 27 29 38 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 22 16 21 WARNING 6 6 6 7

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 13 17 11 PROFICIENT 56 60 62 65 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 22 18 21 WARNING 3 5 3 3

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 44 39 25 PROFICIENT 71 50 57 67 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 2 5 3 7 WARNING 3 1 1 1

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 36 38 46 31 PROFICIENT 41 39 32 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 18 14 23 WARNING 4 4 9 8

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 39 43 35 37 PROFICIENT 55 50 54 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 6 6 11 10 WARNING 1 1 1 2

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 55 50 46 58 PROFICIENT 35 32 37 26 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 14 14 13 WARNING 2 4 3 3

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 35 33 39 34 PROFICIENT 49 49 48 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 14 16 11 17 WARNING 2 1 2 1

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 44 42 57 52 PROFICIENT 31 35 26 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 15 13 9 WARNING 6 8 4 5

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 39 33 32 PROFICIENT 50 36 46 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 23 18 23 WARNING 2 2 2 4

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 34 25 41 PROFICIENT 54 46 56 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 16 18 8 WARNING 4 5 1 4

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 38 41 46 52 PROFICIENT 37 41 36 30 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 15 18 15 WARNING 2 3 0 4

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 28 34 29 35 PROFICIENT 49 50 49 56 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 16 19 8 WARNING 3 1 3 2

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 47 44 55 PROFICIENT 62 33 34 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 20 17 8 WARNING 4 1 5 1

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.