• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 29 50 57 56 PROFICIENT 60 46 42 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 9 4 0 3 FAILING 1 0 1 0

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 48 65 64 55 PROFICIENT 42 30 23 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 4 11 4 FAILING 2 1 2 2

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 18 28 37 PROFICIENT 58 70 62 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 10 10 12 FAILING 2 1 1 0

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 29 21 13 PROFICIENT 68 62 63 71 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 5 11 15 WARNING 2 5 6 1

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 18 21 25 PROFICIENT 40 41 30 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 33 34 25 WARNING 18 8 14 13

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 9 3 0 PROFICIENT 61 58 39 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 28 46 48 WARNING 4 5 13 13

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 7 6 8 PROFICIENT 65 72 71 69 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 14 17 20 20 WARNING 3 3 3 3

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 19 16 25 PROFICIENT 39 38 35 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 31 33 19 WARNING 14 12 16 22

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 16 21 21 PROFICIENT 57 55 53 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 25 21 20 WARNING 2 4 6 3

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 28 35 45 40 PROFICIENT 44 39 30 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 17 21 19 WARNING 3 9 5 10

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 20 30 24 PROFICIENT 57 53 48 57 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 20 20 16 WARNING 2 7 2 2

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 48 42 29 PROFICIENT 39 30 31 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 15 23 24 WARNING 8 7 3 8

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 36 22 17 PROFICIENT 36 31 37 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 42 25 37 22 WARNING 14 8 3 9

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 6 9 14 PROFICIENT 56 55 61 56 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 34 27 26 WARNING 9 4 3 4

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 32 24 23 29 PROFICIENT 40 48 38 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 26 38 28 WARNING 5 2 1 1

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 20 21 14 PROFICIENT 59 63 53 64 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 16 24 21 WARNING 3 1 1 1

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 29 33 56 59 PROFICIENT 58 39 35 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 24 8 4 WARNING 2 3 1 1

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.