• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 49 51 58 54 PROFICIENT 47 44 38 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 2 4 1 2 FAILING 1 1 3 2

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 55 56 67 59 PROFICIENT 33 31 19 29 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 9 7 10 FAILING 2 5 7 2

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 38 41 41 48 PROFICIENT 54 45 42 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 6 11 12 8 FAILING 2 3 5 2

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 36 26 34 25 PROFICIENT 54 66 59 64 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 7 6 7 WARNING 2 2 1 5

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 32 24 26 28 PROFICIENT 33 39 39 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 24 25 26 WARNING 15 13 9 12

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 6 5 5 PROFICIENT 41 54 53 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 43 32 36 37 WARNING 10 9 6 10

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 33 22 19 PROFICIENT 66 59 64 68 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 7 10 10 WARNING 2 2 4 2

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 17 23 23 PROFICIENT 37 45 36 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 31 27 22 WARNING 16 8 14 13

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 29 28 24 21 PROFICIENT 55 52 55 64 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 15 18 11 WARNING 2 5 3 4

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 28 33 36 44 PROFICIENT 46 36 37 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 22 19 17 WARNING 6 9 9 5

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 31 29 30 28 PROFICIENT 53 51 52 56 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 17 16 11 WARNING 3 3 2 5

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 31 35 38 44 PROFICIENT 39 36 36 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 18 22 18 WARNING 8 11 4 7

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 49 42 38 PROFICIENT 42 27 36 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 20 20 19 WARNING 7 4 2 4

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 20 14 25 PROFICIENT 54 58 48 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 18 30 20 WARNING 4 4 8 6

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 17 30 24 PROFICIENT 35 49 30 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 32 34 34 WARNING 6 2 5 5

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 21 18 18 PROFICIENT 67 57 57 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 18 22 24 WARNING 2 5 3 3

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 34 47 45 PROFICIENT 61 38 36 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 21 13 10 WARNING 1 7 4 5

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.