• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 37 35 14 PROFICIENT 68 57 59 75 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 6 6 9 FAILING 0 0 0 2

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 38 43 41 34 PROFICIENT 28 37 32 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 17 18 34 FAILING 5 3 9 5

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 35 21 8 PROFICIENT 61 50 50 61 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 15 25 31 FAILING 3 0 4 0

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 26 4 3 13 PROFICIENT 59 73 74 53 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 9 19 18 25 WARNING 6 4 5 10

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 4 32 10 PROFICIENT 19 35 39 28 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 44 29 24 35 WARNING 17 31 5 28

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 0 0 0 5 PROFICIENT 29 16 34 13 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 63 65 45 58 WARNING 8 20 21 25

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 0 8 5 0 PROFICIENT 52 69 50 58 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 15 32 35 WARNING 9 8 14 6

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 11 16 6 PROFICIENT 27 35 25 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 38 25 27 WARNING 34 16 34 27

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 7 12 6 PROFICIENT 54 59 56 62 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 22 29 23 WARNING 3 13 4 9

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 32 30 17 13 PROFICIENT 37 37 48 53 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 15 17 17 WARNING 11 17 17 17

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 6 6 7 PROFICIENT 54 48 56 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 42 28 29 WARNING 18 4 11 12

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 23 17 20 PROFICIENT 34 33 46 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 25 22 39 WARNING 24 19 15 15

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 18 7 7 PROFICIENT 32 31 26 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 48 39 52 44 WARNING 18 12 15 15

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 0 3 4 PROFICIENT 57 52 55 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 31 33 37 WARNING 4 17 10 10

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 13 10 8 PROFICIENT 29 28 36 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 49 44 43 45 WARNING 10 15 12 8

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 10 8 4 PROFICIENT 56 56 62 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 24 30 52 WARNING 7 10 0 6

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 21 19 6 PROFICIENT 46 29 36 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 36 40 31 WARNING 7 14 6 23

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.