• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 16 17 21 PROFICIENT 59 53 65 63 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 24 14 11 WARNING 3 7 4 4

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 23 27 41 PROFICIENT 46 36 38 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 27 24 16 WARNING 14 14 10 7

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 15 26 20 PROFICIENT 45 44 39 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 33 31 29 WARNING 9 8 4 4

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 8 12 12 PROFICIENT 53 62 48 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 21 36 38 WARNING 9 8 5 9

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 11 16 13 PROFICIENT 34 46 45 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 45 33 36 45 WARNING 9 10 3 6

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.