• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 53 48 64 52 PROFICIENT 44 50 32 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 2 2 3 3 FAILING 1 1 1 0

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 53 51 62 54 PROFICIENT 39 27 25 30 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 6 16 10 14 FAILING 2 6 4 2

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 24 24 19 PROFICIENT 57 60 56 60 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 15 18 19 FAILING 1 1 2 1

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 18 28 7 PROFICIENT 64 68 63 85 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 12 10 8 6 WARNING 4 4 1 2

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 27 21 35 14 PROFICIENT 29 30 36 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 30 24 34 WARNING 15 20 5 10

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 2 0 1 PROFICIENT 46 36 51 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 50 46 56 WARNING 12 13 3 9

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 15 11 11 PROFICIENT 68 65 73 74 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 17 14 13 WARNING 3 2 2 2

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 18 13 7 PROFICIENT 27 37 34 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 42 35 39 45 WARNING 25 10 14 14

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 14 13 16 PROFICIENT 65 65 61 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 12 17 20 23 WARNING 1 4 6 6

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 23 12 22 PROFICIENT 47 47 50 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 26 25 25 WARNING 3 4 13 11

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 10 17 12 PROFICIENT 60 61 50 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 27 25 29 WARNING 2 2 7 8

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 27 34 36 39 PROFICIENT 48 45 42 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 17 17 15 WARNING 4 4 5 10

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 23 21 18 PROFICIENT 58 35 46 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 35 27 34 WARNING 5 7 5 8

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 8 7 7 PROFICIENT 55 54 40 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 30 44 38 WARNING 3 7 9 10

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 25 22 23 PROFICIENT 43 49 42 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 22 34 35 WARNING 4 4 3 4

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 11 5 5 PROFICIENT 56 40 50 62 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 47 38 32 WARNING 6 2 7 1

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 30 30 41 PROFICIENT 62 37 37 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 23 28 14 WARNING 3 10 6 0

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.