• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 30 30 40 35 PROFICIENT 47 52 46 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 13 7 10 FAILING 6 5 6 5

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 45 50 51 56 PROFICIENT 30 28 26 20 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 12 13 12 FAILING 10 9 10 12

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 21 18 29 PROFICIENT 44 42 47 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 31 27 18 FAILING 8 6 7 8

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 15 12 10 PROFICIENT 61 63 60 63 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 11 13 17 16 WARNING 11 10 10 10

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 17 14 12 PROFICIENT 26 28 34 28 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 33 28 32 WARNING 24 21 24 27

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 3 1 2 PROFICIENT 28 28 28 29 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 49 43 48 41 WARNING 22 26 24 28

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 12 6 11 PROFICIENT 60 55 58 58 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 26 25 21 WARNING 7 7 11 10

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 15 11 8 PROFICIENT 21 24 29 26 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 36 26 34 WARNING 31 25 35 33

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 17 12 16 PROFICIENT 48 48 50 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 22 22 25 WARNING 12 14 16 11

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 16 11 17 PROFICIENT 34 30 27 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 30 34 28 WARNING 22 24 28 19

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 14 7 9 PROFICIENT 50 46 55 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 27 28 28 WARNING 9 13 10 15

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 25 25 26 PROFICIENT 36 26 28 24 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 28 28 28 WARNING 16 21 19 23

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 22 10 14 PROFICIENT 34 32 30 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 34 48 38 WARNING 18 12 12 16

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 10 7 7 PROFICIENT 44 43 38 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 34 34 34 WARNING 13 13 21 19

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 14 14 19 PROFICIENT 33 34 29 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 41 40 43 33 WARNING 13 13 14 16

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 11 6 9 PROFICIENT 51 44 41 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 36 40 35 WARNING 8 9 12 14

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 20 26 32 PROFICIENT 51 26 34 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 34 25 20 WARNING 9 20 15 10

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.