• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 59 40 69 67 PROFICIENT 37 58 28 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 4 1 2 1 FAILING 0 1 1 1

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 71 62 68 83 PROFICIENT 22 30 23 13 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 5 5 8 2 FAILING 2 3 2 3

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 52 46 53 59 PROFICIENT 43 47 40 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 3 5 7 6 FAILING 1 1 0 1

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 21 27 17 PROFICIENT 68 73 59 75 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 5 6 11 4 WARNING 3 0 3 4

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 45 36 39 PROFICIENT 34 36 37 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 16 19 14 WARNING 17 3 8 6

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 4 14 12 PROFICIENT 57 60 52 63 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 31 29 21 WARNING 5 5 4 4

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 32 26 22 8 PROFICIENT 60 57 67 69 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 14 10 20 WARNING 1 3 2 3

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 33 27 28 26 PROFICIENT 33 32 45 29 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 31 18 32 WARNING 8 10 9 13

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 37 23 13 PROFICIENT 61 53 59 64 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 12 10 13 16 WARNING 4 1 5 6

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 33 23 20 31 PROFICIENT 33 46 42 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 28 30 30 WARNING 6 2 9 6

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 32 22 25 22 PROFICIENT 57 56 53 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 7 18 17 27 WARNING 4 3 5 4

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 38 32 32 38 PROFICIENT 41 40 36 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 21 24 16 WARNING 3 6 8 13

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 32 22 25 PROFICIENT 54 34 42 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 27 31 26 WARNING 2 7 5 8

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 14 15 17 PROFICIENT 45 54 52 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 23 27 28 WARNING 7 9 6 4

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 19 25 30 PROFICIENT 43 52 38 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 25 34 32 WARNING 2 4 3 4

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 28 16 7 PROFICIENT 63 52 69 70 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 16 15 20 WARNING 3 5 0 2

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 42 42 41 PROFICIENT 52 32 38 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 20 15 16 WARNING 4 6 4 3

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.