• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 65 70 78 85 PROFICIENT 26 28 22 15 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 6 3 0 0 FAILING 3 0 0 0

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 64 61 65 79 PROFICIENT 22 30 20 21 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 9 13 0 FAILING 4 0 2 0

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 56 54 37 38 PROFICIENT 26 37 41 56 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 9 20 5 FAILING 5 0 2 0

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 28 23 31 PROFICIENT 68 69 58 61 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 14 3 18 3 WARNING 6 0 2 5

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 31 17 31 PROFICIENT 23 43 33 23 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 42 22 24 30 WARNING 21 3 26 16

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 7 5 5 PROFICIENT 38 60 29 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 47 30 50 43 WARNING 12 4 17 10

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 24 19 17 PROFICIENT 68 55 66 69 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 18 11 10 WARNING 0 3 3 4

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 32 24 33 8 PROFICIENT 41 31 30 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 31 27 35 WARNING 3 13 11 13

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 36 30 22 25 PROFICIENT 31 52 49 56 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 13 20 18 WARNING 3 6 10 2

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 28 48 20 60 PROFICIENT 27 30 48 18 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 17 22 15 WARNING 22 5 10 7

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 36 17 33 11 PROFICIENT 45 58 53 66 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 9 21 13 17 WARNING 11 4 2 6

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 40 33 53 47 PROFICIENT 33 31 31 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 23 9 17 WARNING 9 13 7 4

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 21 45 26 PROFICIENT 42 35 35 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 35 18 28 WARNING 9 8 2 8

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 0 27 4 25 PROFICIENT 51 45 46 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 40 25 39 20 WARNING 9 4 11 12

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 27 13 39 PROFICIENT 30 45 38 17 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 52 21 45 36 WARNING 11 7 4 8

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 8 18 17 PROFICIENT 62 54 47 56 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 31 32 27 WARNING 2 6 3 0

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 25 29 40 PROFICIENT 55 38 39 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 27 27 23 WARNING 4 10 5 6

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.