• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 33 49 36 PROFICIENT 63 59 47 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 11 7 4 8 FAILING 2 1 1 3

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 37 40 54 49 PROFICIENT 39 45 28 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 12 13 13 FAILING 8 2 5 2

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 27 28 35 PROFICIENT 50 55 56 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 14 14 11 FAILING 4 4 2 2

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 14 13 9 PROFICIENT 57 67 63 75 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 13 21 11 WARNING 4 6 3 5

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 26 28 19 6 PROFICIENT 31 33 31 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 25 32 48 WARNING 19 13 18 19

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 1 2 4 PROFICIENT 34 50 35 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 54 38 54 40 WARNING 10 11 9 8

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 10 5 7 PROFICIENT 60 56 63 63 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 31 27 25 WARNING 4 2 5 4

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 15 6 3 PROFICIENT 39 31 33 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 35 43 33 WARNING 18 19 18 33

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 13 11 6 PROFICIENT 59 61 53 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 19 27 31 WARNING 4 7 9 8

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 20 12 24 PROFICIENT 35 43 39 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 29 33 31 WARNING 13 8 16 13

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 12 9 9 PROFICIENT 59 44 57 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 37 24 41 WARNING 4 7 10 12

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 22 19 13 PROFICIENT 40 34 39 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 32 30 40 WARNING 12 12 12 21

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 20 31 11 PROFICIENT 45 37 32 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 37 29 47 WARNING 7 5 8 9

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 5 3 2 PROFICIENT 25 47 26 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 61 34 49 50 WARNING 11 15 21 17

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 5 3 3 PROFICIENT 26 39 28 19 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 61 45 48 57 WARNING 5 11 21 20

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 7 7 7 PROFICIENT 50 43 42 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 39 43 47 WARNING 7 11 8 6

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 16 13 22 PROFICIENT 54 36 37 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 30 35 29 WARNING 14 18 15 7

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.