• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 34 46 35 40 PROFICIENT 49 45 56 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 9 7 8 FAILING 0 0 2 5

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 51 50 62 54 PROFICIENT 23 27 27 22 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 17 11 14 FAILING 8 6 0 10

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 29 17 12 19 PROFICIENT 53 59 62 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 11 21 23 28 FAILING 7 3 4 12

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 11 7 10 PROFICIENT 76 53 62 71 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 29 22 12 WARNING 6 8 9 6

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 15 10 10 PROFICIENT 34 26 40 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 26 28 34 WARNING 26 32 22 16

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 0 3 0 0 PROFICIENT 20 18 18 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 62 45 56 40 WARNING 18 34 26 18

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 6 4 10 PROFICIENT 46 60 67 63 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 24 25 20 WARNING 9 10 4 8

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 6 17 17 PROFICIENT 20 25 29 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 53 29 33 WARNING 38 16 25 19

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 10 20 4 PROFICIENT 64 76 62 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 12 11 36 WARNING 5 2 7 9

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 40 36 22 PROFICIENT 36 33 43 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 40 21 18 17 WARNING 10 5 2 17

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 9 6 11 PROFICIENT 62 50 56 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 36 27 39 WARNING 2 5 12 5

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 36 27 38 36 PROFICIENT 33 41 29 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 20 25 21 WARNING 10 11 8 5

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 32 10 27 PROFICIENT 38 30 33 20 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 38 30 35 43 WARNING 10 9 23 11

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 12 2 10 PROFICIENT 34 45 44 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 52 31 42 35 WARNING 2 12 12 10

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 10 13 35 PROFICIENT 30 37 32 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 53 40 43 31 WARNING 9 13 12 4

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 7 6 NA PROFICIENT 36 32 48 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 48 44 42 47 WARNING 8 18 4 9

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 14 21 19 PROFICIENT 45 33 52 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 25 25 34 WARNING 20 28 2 13

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.