• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 9 16 13 PROFICIENT 54 54 57 60 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 25 18 20 FAILING 10 12 8 7

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 21 27 27 PROFICIENT 33 26 26 28 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 27 21 26 FAILING 24 25 25 20

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 1 2 4 10 PROFICIENT 25 18 28 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 52 57 52 39 FAILING 21 23 15 16

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 2 1 1 PROFICIENT 39 45 39 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 33 31 31 WARNING 23 20 28 26

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 7 7 3 PROFICIENT 17 16 25 19 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 33 26 33 WARNING 52 45 43 45

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 0 0 0 0 PROFICIENT 6 7 10 9 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 30 39 37 WARNING 59 63 50 54

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 2 1 1 PROFICIENT 36 34 36 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 38 38 41 39 WARNING 24 26 22 26

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 4 2 2 PROFICIENT 13 17 17 13 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 36 28 27 WARNING 50 43 52 58

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 1 3 2 1 PROFICIENT 26 20 27 25 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 38 36 40 WARNING 34 39 35 34

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 6 8 7 PROFICIENT 17 22 21 23 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 26 30 32 WARNING 45 47 41 39

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 3 2 1 PROFICIENT 24 22 22 20 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 38 36 39 37 WARNING 37 39 37 43

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 4 6 6 PROFICIENT 16 17 21 16 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 28 35 30 WARNING 49 51 39 49

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 1 3 2 1 PROFICIENT 11 15 11 8 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 40 43 36 WARNING 52 42 44 55

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 1 1 1 1 PROFICIENT 17 19 16 12 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 40 33 38 38 WARNING 42 48 45 49

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 4 4 5 PROFICIENT 13 14 16 17 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 42 37 48 43 WARNING 42 45 31 35

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 2 1 2 PROFICIENT 19 18 12 13 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 44 54 48 WARNING 39 35 32 37

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 3 7 7 PROFICIENT 27 17 21 24 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 31 37 35 WARNING 35 48 35 35

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.