• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 44 52 55 63 PROFICIENT 46 38 38 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 8 5 3 FAILING 2 2 1 1

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 53 42 60 59 PROFICIENT 29 33 24 29 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 14 20 12 10 FAILING 4 5 5 2

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 27 27 38 PROFICIENT 54 50 50 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 22 20 15 FAILING 3 2 3 2

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 24 23 19 PROFICIENT 63 64 67 70 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 11 10 8 9 WARNING 3 2 3 3

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 28 29 29 PROFICIENT 31 36 30 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 26 28 24 WARNING 16 10 13 10

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 5 5 6 PROFICIENT 33 41 42 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 50 42 45 39 WARNING 14 12 8 10

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 15 18 11 PROFICIENT 65 65 68 66 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 17 10 19 WARNING 3 3 4 5

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 28 27 35 25 PROFICIENT 39 39 34 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 27 21 22 WARNING 13 8 11 17

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 19 24 25 PROFICIENT 59 56 51 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 21 19 20 WARNING 2 4 6 4

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 37 34 22 37 PROFICIENT 31 36 36 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 22 27 19 WARNING 7 8 16 14

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 21 24 27 PROFICIENT 55 45 55 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 25 16 19 WARNING 4 9 5 5

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 30 31 35 34 PROFICIENT 37 34 29 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 22 25 21 WARNING 8 13 11 10

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 25 21 25 PROFICIENT 41 29 33 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 34 35 29 WARNING 9 11 11 8

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 11 8 13 PROFICIENT 46 53 45 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 31 39 34 WARNING 8 5 8 8

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 20 20 16 PROFICIENT 38 39 34 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 34 39 45 WARNING 6 6 6 7

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 22 13 15 PROFICIENT 66 55 58 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 19 27 26 WARNING 4 4 2 4

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 34 31 34 PROFICIENT 60 38 36 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 21 24 20 WARNING 4 6 9 7

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.