• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 41 42 59 55 PROFICIENT 50 51 37 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 5 4 3 FAILING 2 2 0 1

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 55 53 71 60 PROFICIENT 25 29 20 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 13 6 6 FAILING 5 5 3 2

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 18 24 16 PROFICIENT 52 57 58 63 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 21 18 20 FAILING 4 4 1 1

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 29 22 26 15 PROFICIENT 64 65 66 69 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 6 12 7 9 WARNING 2 2 2 7

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 15 27 16 PROFICIENT 43 43 47 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 32 20 35 WARNING 8 11 6 9

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 3 2 2 PROFICIENT 51 49 34 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 38 38 54 47 WARNING 5 10 9 12

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 22 11 17 PROFICIENT 62 69 68 60 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 7 17 19 WARNING 2 2 4 5

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 19 16 13 PROFICIENT 38 40 40 28 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 33 31 36 WARNING 10 8 12 23

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 28 34 21 18 PROFICIENT 61 50 61 57 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 12 11 19 WARNING 2 5 6 5

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 33 35 34 34 PROFICIENT 44 45 42 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 13 19 21 WARNING 4 7 5 9

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 20 20 19 PROFICIENT 60 54 56 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 23 20 23 WARNING 5 4 5 2

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 26 32 32 PROFICIENT 47 41 37 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 28 24 27 WARNING 7 6 7 5

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 32 34 36 PROFICIENT 47 45 39 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 22 20 16 WARNING 5 1 7 2

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 15 15 18 PROFICIENT 47 42 44 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 32 37 33 WARNING 7 11 3 7

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 15 21 26 PROFICIENT 30 42 40 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 52 38 36 31 WARNING 5 6 3 8

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 10 10 13 PROFICIENT 47 51 53 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 42 34 30 30 WARNING 6 5 7 9

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 17 24 23 PROFICIENT 45 36 41 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 38 34 27 25 WARNING 14 13 8 7

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.