• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 43 48 47 40 PROFICIENT 52 46 45 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 5 6 7 7 FAILING 0 0 1 4

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 40 44 53 36 PROFICIENT 38 30 26 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 19 19 23 FAILING 0 8 3 9

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 23 20 17 PROFICIENT 57 59 57 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 17 23 27 FAILING 0 1 1 7

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 5 16 5 PROFICIENT 65 68 71 78 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 20 11 15 WARNING 5 7 3 3

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 12 18 14 PROFICIENT 28 23 34 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 33 30 37 WARNING 26 32 18 18

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 1 1 2 PROFICIENT 32 38 41 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 54 40 46 47 WARNING 11 21 12 13

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 22 10 7 PROFICIENT 64 61 68 60 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 15 20 26 WARNING 9 2 2 7

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 17 18 10 PROFICIENT 42 39 38 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 32 29 30 WARNING 19 12 14 21

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 15 7 14 PROFICIENT 59 54 59 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 28 26 25 WARNING 3 4 9 11

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 30 16 19 PROFICIENT 42 39 38 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 19 34 32 WARNING 9 11 12 17

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 7 19 26 PROFICIENT 56 48 51 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 35 19 24 WARNING 3 10 11 4

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 15 29 29 PROFICIENT 42 37 34 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 30 25 26 WARNING 12 17 13 13

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 27 21 31 PROFICIENT 46 38 43 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 27 26 34 WARNING 4 8 10 4

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 1 5 5 5 PROFICIENT 37 48 48 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 48 33 36 41 WARNING 14 13 10 13

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 14 13 14 PROFICIENT 25 26 42 25 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 63 48 37 50 WARNING 10 12 8 11

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 14 10 12 PROFICIENT 55 47 46 61 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 35 37 24 WARNING 8 5 7 4

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 15 28 31 PROFICIENT 51 36 40 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 35 22 23 WARNING 11 14 10 6

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.