• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 29 42 36 43 PROFICIENT 61 52 57 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 5 6 3 FAILING 1 1 1 1

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 51 51 56 64 PROFICIENT 29 30 24 24 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 15 13 9 FAILING 4 3 7 3

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 27 20 27 PROFICIENT 66 55 58 56 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 16 19 15 FAILING 3 2 4 2

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 17 20 13 PROFICIENT 78 74 67 75 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 7 8 9 WARNING 2 1 4 4

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 24 26 19 PROFICIENT 34 35 40 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 32 26 27 WARNING 14 9 8 11

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 4 3 4 PROFICIENT 38 43 39 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 50 43 50 40 WARNING 11 10 7 7

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 11 4 10 PROFICIENT 69 67 78 67 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 18 15 20 WARNING 2 4 3 4

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 27 14 14 PROFICIENT 43 38 48 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 27 28 29 WARNING 9 7 10 15

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 20 16 21 PROFICIENT 61 58 57 61 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 18 21 13 WARNING 4 4 7 5

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 34 30 30 34 PROFICIENT 36 41 41 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 21 22 24 WARNING 7 8 7 5

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 16 20 19 PROFICIENT 61 47 53 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 30 24 26 WARNING 4 7 3 6

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 25 32 32 PROFICIENT 42 35 39 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 28 22 24 WARNING 9 11 6 9

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 22 25 26 PROFICIENT 54 38 37 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 33 33 34 WARNING 4 7 5 5

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 10 9 11 PROFICIENT 43 55 43 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 44 28 38 36 WARNING 7 6 10 6

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 11 13 19 PROFICIENT 33 40 37 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 52 42 42 39 WARNING 6 7 8 5

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 17 9 14 PROFICIENT 54 47 48 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 31 40 28 WARNING 4 5 3 9

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 23 28 40 PROFICIENT 61 35 42 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 30 26 16 WARNING 6 12 4 7

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.