• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 64 70 77 75 PROFICIENT 33 27 23 24 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 2 2 0 1 FAILING 1 1 0 0

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 84 87 78 88 PROFICIENT 14 11 15 11 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 1 1 6 0 FAILING 1 1 1 1

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 49 37 44 PROFICIENT 59 37 44 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 12 19 9 FAILING 0 1 0 1

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 39 42 37 25 PROFICIENT 54 55 61 72 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 4 3 2 2 WARNING 3 0 0 2

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 35 39 23 16 PROFICIENT 40 39 54 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 19 21 35 WARNING 7 3 3 5

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 11 2 3 PROFICIENT 45 54 61 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 43 31 37 47 WARNING 8 5 1 5

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 37 15 17 21 PROFICIENT 50 80 72 71 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 5 10 6 WARNING 0 0 1 2

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 40 41 28 25 PROFICIENT 42 40 47 53 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 17 17 15 WARNING 2 2 8 7

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 34 29 31 PROFICIENT 70 55 61 58 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 9 7 10 WARNING 0 2 3 1

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 30 40 39 35 PROFICIENT 46 42 45 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 15 11 18 WARNING 2 4 5 4

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 29 23 26 29 PROFICIENT 57 58 58 56 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 12 15 14 14 WARNING 2 5 2 1

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 44 51 44 49 PROFICIENT 43 32 37 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 11 12 17 12 WARNING 3 5 3 3

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 27 34 31 38 PROFICIENT 51 42 35 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 17 32 18 WARNING 3 7 2 1

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 23 21 23 PROFICIENT 53 54 57 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 20 21 21 WARNING 5 3 1 1

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 28 29 32 28 PROFICIENT 40 44 45 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 26 23 28 WARNING 3 1 1 1

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 14 15 8 PROFICIENT 63 66 61 64 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 18 22 26 WARNING 3 2 1 2

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 40 41 37 PROFICIENT 65 47 46 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 11 11 17 WARNING 1 1 1 2

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.