• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 28 40 38 46 PROFICIENT 57 56 55 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 14 3 5 5 FAILING 1 2 1 5

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 40 63 63 55 PROFICIENT 38 24 26 26 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 11 9 14 FAILING 5 2 2 5

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 29 15 8 PROFICIENT 46 44 56 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 25 29 34 FAILING 4 3 0 6

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 12 10 5 PROFICIENT 68 68 71 75 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 15 14 13 WARNING 6 5 6 7

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 19 16 12 PROFICIENT 27 37 30 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 38 30 40 39 WARNING 23 14 14 18

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 1 2 1 1 PROFICIENT 26 37 26 30 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 57 41 55 51 WARNING 16 19 18 18

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 7 4 6 PROFICIENT 66 63 65 66 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 24 26 26 WARNING 7 6 6 2

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 23 13 14 PROFICIENT 29 32 38 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 32 37 34 WARNING 16 13 13 13

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 5 7 16 PROFICIENT 61 54 63 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 31 27 27 WARNING 8 10 4 6

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 22 19 23 PROFICIENT 36 31 43 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 29 27 31 WARNING 16 18 12 14

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 1 10 10 11 PROFICIENT 60 59 49 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 28 32 28 WARNING 9 3 10 11

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 26 22 18 PROFICIENT 30 43 38 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 20 29 23 WARNING 18 11 11 21

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 19 17 13 PROFICIENT 33 41 32 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 47 37 45 44 WARNING 11 3 6 11

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 1 7 1 5 PROFICIENT 44 47 35 30 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 51 35 45 53 WARNING 4 11 18 12

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 11 11 9 PROFICIENT 37 35 28 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 48 42 51 48 WARNING 6 12 10 8

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 5 3 2 PROFICIENT 54 58 54 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 29 38 41 WARNING 5 8 5 6

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 21 25 30 PROFICIENT 54 34 34 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 31 34 21 WARNING 7 14 8 10

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.