• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 54 56 67 64 PROFICIENT 37 39 31 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 5 3 1 1 FAILING 3 1 1 1

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 72 69 78 72 PROFICIENT 17 20 14 20 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 6 8 4 5 FAILING 5 2 5 3

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 37 49 38 37 PROFICIENT 48 36 47 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 12 12 13 9 FAILING 3 3 2 2

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 36 29 37 24 PROFICIENT 58 66 53 65 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 5 4 7 7 WARNING 1 1 3 3

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 41 32 40 31 PROFICIENT 35 40 33 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 21 16 22 WARNING 8 7 11 9

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 8 7 4 PROFICIENT 43 48 50 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 45 36 32 34 WARNING 4 8 10 12

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 19 13 15 PROFICIENT 71 61 72 69 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 11 15 10 15 WARNING 2 4 4 2

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 32 42 36 28 PROFICIENT 37 36 39 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 14 15 21 WARNING 10 8 10 10

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 27 25 21 27 PROFICIENT 56 51 61 58 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 11 18 15 12 WARNING 6 6 3 3

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 38 30 30 35 PROFICIENT 36 41 38 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 19 23 19 WARNING 10 9 9 10

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 31 23 33 30 PROFICIENT 51 50 52 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 14 24 11 17 WARNING 4 3 4 6

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 38 42 54 41 PROFICIENT 40 28 30 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 20 10 13 WARNING 7 10 6 11

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 27 34 27 PROFICIENT 39 29 34 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 36 28 34 WARNING 5 8 4 6

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 16 15 27 PROFICIENT 54 51 45 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 28 32 19 WARNING 4 5 7 5

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 26 23 28 42 PROFICIENT 34 41 37 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 32 28 21 WARNING 4 4 6 4

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 16 12 17 PROFICIENT 59 52 59 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 28 27 25 WARNING 3 5 2 4

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 29 37 60 60 PROFICIENT 57 31 29 29 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 24 9 7 WARNING 5 8 2 4

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.