• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 33 49 53 47 PROFICIENT 60 38 36 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 7 7 9 8 FAILING 0 7 2 4

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 39 49 50 39 PROFICIENT 31 33 17 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 9 29 24 FAILING 3 9 4 6

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 11 30 17 PROFICIENT 69 59 34 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 23 30 22 FAILING 0 7 7 7

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 17 19 18 PROFICIENT 64 71 63 71 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 12 5 9 8 WARNING 3 6 9 3

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 19 13 17 PROFICIENT 21 40 39 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 21 27 37 WARNING 24 19 21 15

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 3 1 2 PROFICIENT 33 40 28 25 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 46 45 52 60 WARNING 16 11 18 14

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 11 8 10 PROFICIENT 67 67 72 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 15 18 28 WARNING 5 8 2 10

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 30 18 20 15 PROFICIENT 32 29 42 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 42 29 21 WARNING 17 11 9 21

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 29 35 16 22 PROFICIENT 52 52 57 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 11 25 24 WARNING 5 2 2 2

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 49 33 49 PROFICIENT 39 29 44 29 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 15 14 17 WARNING 12 6 8 5

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 29 31 22 28 PROFICIENT 51 36 49 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 28 22 17 WARNING 3 5 6 5

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 49 33 38 48 PROFICIENT 35 33 38 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 14 26 17 14 WARNING 2 8 6 5

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 27 25 17 PROFICIENT 41 27 25 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 42 44 33 WARNING 2 5 5 5

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 9 7 13 PROFICIENT 30 47 52 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 36 30 39 WARNING 25 7 11 8

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 7 12 25 PROFICIENT 31 45 44 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 40 42 37 38 WARNING 21 5 7 10

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 25 15 12 PROFICIENT 52 53 51 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 16 29 28 WARNING 4 5 5 5

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 38 47 42 PROFICIENT 56 35 35 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 20 11 12 WARNING 4 7 7 5

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.