• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 20 16 29 PROFICIENT 63 66 72 65 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 9 8 5 FAILING 5 5 4 1

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 40 33 47 45 PROFICIENT 29 41 32 28 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 19 12 23 FAILING 10 8 9 4

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 10 11 23 PROFICIENT 47 45 40 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 39 40 29 FAILING 7 5 9 8

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 7 9 11 PROFICIENT 61 67 64 65 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 20 18 17 WARNING 6 6 9 7

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 10 8 9 PROFICIENT 27 28 27 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 34 32 41 WARNING 25 27 33 24

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 0 1 3 PROFICIENT 21 25 24 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 58 49 51 43 WARNING 19 26 24 19

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 3 4 1 PROFICIENT 52 52 64 59 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 36 24 35 WARNING 9 9 8 5

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 7 10 8 PROFICIENT 26 33 20 20 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 32 47 42 WARNING 32 28 24 29

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 8 5 9 PROFICIENT 58 49 44 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 34 35 25 WARNING 9 9 16 11

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 14 18 21 PROFICIENT 30 33 35 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 37 30 33 WARNING 18 16 16 12

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 6 14 12 PROFICIENT 53 44 47 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 37 29 38 WARNING 7 14 11 8

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 20 25 22 PROFICIENT 35 34 34 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 32 28 27 WARNING 18 14 14 19

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 11 15 9 PROFICIENT 31 30 35 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 49 46 42 45 WARNING 14 13 8 10

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 9 3 4 PROFICIENT 37 39 33 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 43 39 53 40 WARNING 14 14 11 10

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 12 10 10 PROFICIENT 30 31 33 26 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 50 47 47 55 WARNING 13 10 11 9

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 9 8 10 PROFICIENT 52 41 48 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 46 38 32 WARNING 6 4 6 10

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 12 16 21 PROFICIENT 57 41 42 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 30 32 29 WARNING 6 17 11 11

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.