• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 21 34 22 PROFICIENT 58 63 50 56 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 12 7 12 FAILING 6 4 9 9

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 19 38 31 PROFICIENT 31 25 27 30 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 43 22 23 FAILING 14 13 14 16

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 20 25 19 PROFICIENT 51 44 44 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 28 20 31 FAILING 7 8 11 12

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 8 11 3 PROFICIENT 64 60 54 61 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 22 22 21 WARNING 11 10 13 15

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 7 4 3 PROFICIENT 23 23 23 18 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 39 39 43 WARNING 28 31 35 36

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 1 2 0 2 PROFICIENT 31 37 31 24 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 50 38 52 52 WARNING 17 23 17 21

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 6 0 2 PROFICIENT 57 44 52 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 37 35 38 WARNING 10 13 13 10

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 12 2 2 PROFICIENT 28 23 34 23 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 43 33 39 WARNING 26 23 31 35

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 6 5 3 PROFICIENT 40 43 49 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 40 31 35 42 WARNING 10 20 12 18

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 31 18 18 14 PROFICIENT 29 35 30 26 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 25 36 37 WARNING 17 22 16 22

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 3 4 1 PROFICIENT 49 37 30 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 46 42 44 WARNING 15 14 24 22

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 4 8 17 PROFICIENT 28 28 20 22 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 33 40 31 WARNING 27 34 31 30

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 5 2 9 PROFICIENT 31 24 17 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 45 54 54 43 WARNING 20 17 28 22

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 1 4 0 PROFICIENT 32 31 24 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 47 40 42 50 WARNING 17 28 29 18

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 2 3 4 PROFICIENT 28 19 20 25 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 55 46 50 50 WARNING 15 33 26 20

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 10 3 1 PROFICIENT 37 30 40 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 42 44 48 44 WARNING 19 16 10 17

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 11 10 4 PROFICIENT 34 25 31 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 27 38 32 WARNING 24 37 21 34

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.