• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 27 36 37 28 PROFICIENT 56 52 48 63 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 14 7 13 6 FAILING 2 4 2 2

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 41 46 38 36 PROFICIENT 33 31 39 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 15 13 22 FAILING 5 8 11 4

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 12 8 12 PROFICIENT 40 52 55 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 34 31 39 FAILING 4 2 6 4

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 19 18 11 PROFICIENT 64 70 74 80 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 9 5 5 WARNING 5 3 4 3

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 15 20 17 PROFICIENT 34 38 34 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 30 30 27 WARNING 15 17 16 15

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 10 4 8 PROFICIENT 46 44 39 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 35 50 44 WARNING 9 11 7 7

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 11 6 13 PROFICIENT 70 72 74 68 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 13 17 13 WARNING 3 4 3 6

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 18 16 15 PROFICIENT 39 32 39 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 38 27 30 WARNING 19 11 18 20

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 12 21 16 PROFICIENT 58 66 57 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 15 18 27 WARNING 3 7 4 10

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 28 16 29 22 PROFICIENT 39 43 33 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 31 27 29 WARNING 9 10 11 18

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 17 19 9 PROFICIENT 50 48 46 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 25 25 32 WARNING 4 9 10 11

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 23 21 18 PROFICIENT 47 35 36 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 29 30 19 WARNING 7 13 12 20

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 23 13 12 PROFICIENT 49 39 36 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 28 40 39 WARNING 4 10 11 8

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 9 4 12 PROFICIENT 51 43 46 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 34 39 34 WARNING 9 15 10 11

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 12 10 20 PROFICIENT 35 43 49 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 47 36 36 37 WARNING 7 10 5 9

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 18 8 16 PROFICIENT 51 42 46 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 34 40 27 WARNING 13 6 5 9

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 34 28 44 PROFICIENT 58 34 45 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 20 20 15 WARNING 7 12 7 7

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.