• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 30 37 32 PROFICIENT 56 56 50 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 10 11 13 FAILING 3 4 2 6

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 25 40 32 PROFICIENT 34 30 30 30 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 30 24 26 FAILING 14 15 7 11

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 7 6 15 PROFICIENT 34 37 48 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 51 49 41 39 FAILING 11 7 5 7

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 7 5 6 PROFICIENT 64 67 62 64 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 19 21 22 WARNING 8 7 11 8

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 10 7 6 PROFICIENT 26 30 24 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 32 39 39 WARNING 28 29 29 24

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 1 2 1 2 PROFICIENT 31 29 31 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 50 44 48 50 WARNING 18 24 20 18

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 4 5 0 PROFICIENT 59 55 56 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 32 30 38 WARNING 7 9 9 13

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 6 7 7 PROFICIENT 34 26 39 28 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 47 30 32 WARNING 26 21 24 33

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 9 5 4 PROFICIENT 50 49 48 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 28 34 34 WARNING 9 14 13 15

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 17 12 11 PROFICIENT 33 34 34 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 28 31 38 WARNING 23 21 23 25

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 10 9 10 PROFICIENT 55 43 43 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 31 37 41 WARNING 10 16 11 11

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 16 15 21 PROFICIENT 42 32 36 24 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 30 30 34 WARNING 14 23 19 21

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 13 7 18 PROFICIENT 42 25 24 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 44 50 40 WARNING 14 18 19 9

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 6 7 8 PROFICIENT 42 45 38 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 35 39 32 WARNING 15 14 15 15

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 7 12 17 PROFICIENT 31 37 32 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 47 43 47 33 WARNING 14 13 8 11

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 10 4 5 PROFICIENT 44 44 44 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 38 36 39 35 WARNING 11 9 13 22

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 21 20 15 PROFICIENT 54 33 38 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 29 25 26 WARNING 10 17 17 19

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.