• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 30 26 37 38 PROFICIENT 58 63 59 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 9 10 4 3 FAILING 3 1 1 3

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 42 32 55 47 PROFICIENT 33 43 29 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 17 14 14 FAILING 8 8 2 8

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 11 9 9 PROFICIENT 49 39 54 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 45 33 41 FAILING 3 5 4 0

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 12 8 9 PROFICIENT 78 68 66 74 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 17 18 8 WARNING 4 3 8 9

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 13 16 16 PROFICIENT 37 29 42 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 35 25 32 WARNING 17 23 18 18

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 1 2 2 1 PROFICIENT 42 26 34 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 50 56 54 44 WARNING 8 17 11 11

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 6 10 6 PROFICIENT 63 61 63 63 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 25 21 22 WARNING 6 8 7 9

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 17 20 10 PROFICIENT 29 31 32 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 34 32 36 WARNING 27 18 17 21

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 15 16 15 PROFICIENT 57 58 50 57 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 19 26 20 WARNING 7 8 8 9

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 27 17 25 PROFICIENT 31 38 46 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 22 31 29 WARNING 15 13 6 15

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 8 9 6 PROFICIENT 56 52 48 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 31 29 43 WARNING 8 9 14 15

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 10 20 21 PROFICIENT 32 28 20 21 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 39 41 32 WARNING 21 23 20 25

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 9 7 13 PROFICIENT 43 27 38 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 41 48 40 39 WARNING 10 16 15 15

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 4 8 10 PROFICIENT 48 41 38 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 37 37 35 WARNING 9 17 17 14

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 4 11 9 PROFICIENT 26 24 25 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 57 50 49 42 WARNING 11 21 15 12

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 9 17 8 PROFICIENT 55 44 47 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 37 28 46 WARNING 8 11 8 8

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 18 44 19 PROFICIENT 53 27 27 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 30 14 31 WARNING 9 25 16 2

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.