• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 52 59 56 54 PROFICIENT 41 40 40 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 4 1 2 2 FAILING 2 0 2 1

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 70 72 72 65 PROFICIENT 21 21 20 22 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 6 6 5 12 FAILING 3 1 3 1

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 34 38 31 45 PROFICIENT 54 52 59 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 9 7 10 FAILING 3 0 2 1

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 34 37 39 34 PROFICIENT 61 57 53 60 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 2 4 6 5 WARNING 2 1 2 2

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 32 33 33 30 PROFICIENT 39 36 43 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 25 18 23 WARNING 6 6 6 6

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 6 9 12 PROFICIENT 53 55 51 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 33 36 30 WARNING 5 6 4 4

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 27 24 23 PROFICIENT 71 60 65 69 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 9 11 9 8 WARNING 2 2 1 0

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 27 32 36 PROFICIENT 45 40 40 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 26 22 15 WARNING 10 6 6 3

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 31 29 21 26 PROFICIENT 55 56 64 60 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 12 14 10 WARNING 4 3 1 3

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 32 33 39 51 PROFICIENT 39 44 48 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 18 10 14 WARNING 7 6 3 4

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 18 22 28 PROFICIENT 58 56 58 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 25 17 17 WARNING 2 1 3 3

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 33 35 40 30 PROFICIENT 40 42 42 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 19 14 22 WARNING 4 4 4 10

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 32 25 25 PROFICIENT 51 44 42 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 22 31 35 WARNING 2 2 2 6

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 13 9 14 PROFICIENT 54 55 49 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 27 35 29 WARNING 3 6 6 3

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 17 22 21 PROFICIENT 39 53 41 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 46 27 33 36 WARNING 2 4 4 3

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 16 14 22 PROFICIENT 67 58 60 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 23 25 29 WARNING 1 2 1 2

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 30 39 45 PROFICIENT 70 40 45 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 24 11 18 WARNING 2 6 4 2

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.