• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 37 49 63 49 PROFICIENT 58 48 34 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 4 3 3 3 FAILING 1 0 0 1

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 54 51 66 53 PROFICIENT 33 38 24 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 9 7 12 FAILING 1 2 2 2

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 26 17 34 PROFICIENT 62 62 65 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 12 18 13 FAILING 1 1 1 1

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 26 16 23 20 PROFICIENT 63 72 70 75 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 10 6 4 WARNING 2 2 2 1

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 26 25 20 19 PROFICIENT 30 32 34 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 31 37 26 WARNING 11 13 10 8

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 7 4 5 PROFICIENT 53 52 45 58 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 35 43 33 WARNING 8 6 8 3

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 10 12 6 PROFICIENT 70 75 76 76 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 12 11 16 WARNING 3 3 1 3

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 30 22 25 16 PROFICIENT 36 39 43 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 30 20 33 WARNING 7 8 12 12

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 27 9 22 PROFICIENT 70 58 68 61 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 12 20 13 WARNING 2 2 3 4

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 31 36 25 40 PROFICIENT 39 38 43 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 19 26 22 WARNING 8 6 6 7

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 28 17 28 22 PROFICIENT 57 53 50 59 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 14 27 18 15 WARNING 1 3 3 3

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 32 18 33 35 PROFICIENT 43 42 35 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 30 23 23 WARNING 7 10 10 8

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 28 35 28 PROFICIENT 53 45 32 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 24 29 23 WARNING 2 3 4 3

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 18 16 13 PROFICIENT 56 54 55 53 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 21 25 27 WARNING 6 7 4 7

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 18 22 22 PROFICIENT 35 43 41 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 44 31 31 40 WARNING 4 8 5 6

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 27 13 19 PROFICIENT 60 55 59 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 15 25 24 WARNING 3 3 3 3

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 43 33 39 PROFICIENT 62 36 43 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 18 16 18 WARNING 6 3 7 4

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.