• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 12 14 19 PROFICIENT 51 56 60 58 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 26 21 15 FAILING 11 6 5 8

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 25 25 24 PROFICIENT 30 29 32 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 28 26 27 FAILING 21 18 17 18

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 6 10 18 PROFICIENT 30 33 38 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 46 43 40 32 FAILING 19 17 13 9

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 6 3 1 PROFICIENT 60 51 52 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 29 25 25 WARNING 10 14 20 26

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 11 5 8 PROFICIENT 26 21 24 25 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 35 32 34 WARNING 32 33 38 32

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 0 1 0 0 PROFICIENT 14 19 12 11 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 48 41 47 43 WARNING 37 40 40 46

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 3 3 1 PROFICIENT 52 45 45 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 37 35 39 WARNING 13 15 17 19

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 6 6 3 PROFICIENT 26 21 25 15 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 34 26 28 WARNING 32 39 42 54

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 4 3 2 PROFICIENT 39 39 32 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 35 40 35 WARNING 21 22 25 33

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 18 5 13 PROFICIENT 29 29 27 19 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 31 36 26 WARNING 30 21 32 42

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 5 3 1 PROFICIENT 38 25 28 22 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 42 44 37 33 WARNING 17 26 33 43

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 10 8 6 PROFICIENT 34 25 22 22 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 36 32 29 WARNING 24 30 38 42

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 3 2 1 PROFICIENT 19 16 14 11 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 50 50 53 45 WARNING 29 30 31 43

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 4 4 4 PROFICIENT 34 31 31 22 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 44 39 38 46 WARNING 19 26 27 28

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 10 12 15 PROFICIENT 31 36 28 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 48 41 46 38 WARNING 11 13 13 14

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 3 3 3 PROFICIENT 35 31 25 22 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 47 44 57 54 WARNING 16 22 15 21

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 17 21 17 PROFICIENT 48 29 37 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 31 29 29 WARNING 11 23 13 15

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.